File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00113-022-01159-y
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85150455301
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: 3D printing in fracture treatment: Current practice and best practice consensus
Title | 3D printing in fracture treatment: Current practice and best practice consensus 3D-Druck in der Frakturversorgung: Aktuelle Praxis und „Best-practice“-Konsens |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Anatomic models Fracture fixation Intra-articular fractures Organization and administration Patient-specific instruments |
Issue Date | 11-Jul-2022 |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Citation | Die Unfallchirurgie, 2022, v. 125, n. Supp 1, p. 1-7 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The use of 3D printing in orthopedic trauma is supported by clinical evidence. Existing computed tomography (CT) data are exploited for better stereotactic identification of morphological features of the fracture and enhanced surgical planning. Due to complex logistic, technical and resource constraints, deployment of 3D printing is not straightforward from the hospital management perspective. As a result not all trauma surgeons are able to confidently integrate 3D printing into the daily practice. We carried out an expert panel survey on six trauma units which utilized 3D printing routinely. The most frequent indications are acetabular and articular fractures and malalignments. Infrastructure and manpower structure varied between units. The installation of industrial grade machines and dedicated software as well as the use of trained personnel can enhance the capacity and reliability of fracture treatment. Setting up interdisciplinary jointly used 3d printing departments with sound financial and management structures may improve sustainability. The sometimes substantial logistic and technical barriers which impede the rapid delivery of 3D printed models are discussed. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/344337 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.255 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fang, Christian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cai, Leyi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, Gabriel | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jarayabhand, Rahat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Ji Wan | - |
dc.contributor.author | O’Neill, Gavin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-24T13:50:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-24T13:50:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-11 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Die Unfallchirurgie, 2022, v. 125, n. Supp 1, p. 1-7 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2731-7021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/344337 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of 3D printing in orthopedic trauma is supported by clinical evidence. Existing computed tomography (CT) data are exploited for better stereotactic identification of morphological features of the fracture and enhanced surgical planning. Due to complex logistic, technical and resource constraints, deployment of 3D printing is not straightforward from the hospital management perspective. As a result not all trauma surgeons are able to confidently integrate 3D printing into the daily practice. We carried out an expert panel survey on six trauma units which utilized 3D printing routinely. The most frequent indications are acetabular and articular fractures and malalignments. Infrastructure and manpower structure varied between units. The installation of industrial grade machines and dedicated software as well as the use of trained personnel can enhance the capacity and reliability of fracture treatment. Setting up interdisciplinary jointly used 3d printing departments with sound financial and management structures may improve sustainability. The sometimes substantial logistic and technical barriers which impede the rapid delivery of 3D printed models are discussed. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Die Unfallchirurgie | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Anatomic models | - |
dc.subject | Fracture fixation | - |
dc.subject | Intra-articular fractures | - |
dc.subject | Organization and administration | - |
dc.subject | Patient-specific instruments | - |
dc.title | 3D printing in fracture treatment: Current practice and best practice consensus | - |
dc.title | 3D-Druck in der Frakturversorgung: Aktuelle Praxis und „Best-practice“-Konsens | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00113-022-01159-y | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85150455301 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 125 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | Supp 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2731-703X | - |