File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: 3D printing in fracture treatment: Current practice and best practice consensus

Title3D printing in fracture treatment: Current practice and best practice consensus
3D-Druck in der Frakturversorgung: Aktuelle Praxis und „Best-practice“-Konsens
Authors
KeywordsAnatomic models
Fracture fixation
Intra-articular fractures
Organization and administration
Patient-specific instruments
Issue Date11-Jul-2022
PublisherSpringer Nature
Citation
Die Unfallchirurgie, 2022, v. 125, n. Supp 1, p. 1-7 How to Cite?
AbstractThe use of 3D printing in orthopedic trauma is supported by clinical evidence. Existing computed tomography (CT) data are exploited for better stereotactic identification of morphological features of the fracture and enhanced surgical planning. Due to complex logistic, technical and resource constraints, deployment of 3D printing is not straightforward from the hospital management perspective. As a result not all trauma surgeons are able to confidently integrate 3D printing into the daily practice. We carried out an expert panel survey on six trauma units which utilized 3D printing routinely. The most frequent indications are acetabular and articular fractures and malalignments. Infrastructure and manpower structure varied between units. The installation of industrial grade machines and dedicated software as well as the use of trained personnel can enhance the capacity and reliability of fracture treatment. Setting up interdisciplinary jointly used 3d printing departments with sound financial and management structures may improve sustainability. The sometimes substantial logistic and technical barriers which impede the rapid delivery of 3D printed models are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344337
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.255

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFang, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorCai, Leyi-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Gabriel-
dc.contributor.authorJarayabhand, Rahat-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ji Wan-
dc.contributor.authorO’Neill, Gavin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T13:50:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-24T13:50:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-11-
dc.identifier.citationDie Unfallchirurgie, 2022, v. 125, n. Supp 1, p. 1-7-
dc.identifier.issn2731-7021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344337-
dc.description.abstractThe use of 3D printing in orthopedic trauma is supported by clinical evidence. Existing computed tomography (CT) data are exploited for better stereotactic identification of morphological features of the fracture and enhanced surgical planning. Due to complex logistic, technical and resource constraints, deployment of 3D printing is not straightforward from the hospital management perspective. As a result not all trauma surgeons are able to confidently integrate 3D printing into the daily practice. We carried out an expert panel survey on six trauma units which utilized 3D printing routinely. The most frequent indications are acetabular and articular fractures and malalignments. Infrastructure and manpower structure varied between units. The installation of industrial grade machines and dedicated software as well as the use of trained personnel can enhance the capacity and reliability of fracture treatment. Setting up interdisciplinary jointly used 3d printing departments with sound financial and management structures may improve sustainability. The sometimes substantial logistic and technical barriers which impede the rapid delivery of 3D printed models are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature-
dc.relation.ispartofDie Unfallchirurgie-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAnatomic models-
dc.subjectFracture fixation-
dc.subjectIntra-articular fractures-
dc.subjectOrganization and administration-
dc.subjectPatient-specific instruments-
dc.title3D printing in fracture treatment: Current practice and best practice consensus-
dc.title3D-Druck in der Frakturversorgung: Aktuelle Praxis und „Best-practice“-Konsens-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00113-022-01159-y-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85150455301-
dc.identifier.volume125-
dc.identifier.issueSupp 1-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage7-
dc.identifier.eissn2731-703X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats