File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Are super-long escalators safe? Lessons learned from the Langham place escalator incident in Hong Kong

TitleAre super-long escalators safe? Lessons learned from the Langham place escalator incident in Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsFatigue failure
Main drive chain
Safety factor
Safety regulations
Super-long escalators
Issue Date15-Apr-2021
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
HKIE Transactions, 2021, v. 28, n. 1, p. 49-57 How to Cite?
AbstractSuper-long escalators that are increasingly used in mega-cities take up a large number of passengers, and so their risk of sudden failure draws serious attention. As a case study, on 25 March 2017, an escalator with a 21 m elevation in Hong Kong’s Langham Place had its main drive chain suddenly snapped by metal fatigue, causing the escalator to reverse at an accelerating speed. A number of passengers were injured. In this paper, two issues will be discussed: (1) whether metal fatigue of the main drive chain can be detected with conventional protocols, and (2) what safety factor is needed to prevent metal fatigue. Analysis shows that initial fatigue cracks in escalator drive chains may not be easily detected with the commonly adopted maintenance protocol. Also, the time window from the emergence of clear signs of fatigue failure to the sudden snapping of the drive chain may be as short as weeks or even days, versus the common safety inspection intervals of six months. The safety factor to prevent metal fatigue of the drive chain should be at least 7, whereas lower values are allowed. The Hong Kong government has since then changed regulations and adopted additional measures to safeguard escalator failures against metal fatigue.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344311
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.167

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgan, A. H.W.-
dc.contributor.authorSiu, K.W.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T13:50:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-24T13:50:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-15-
dc.identifier.citationHKIE Transactions, 2021, v. 28, n. 1, p. 49-57-
dc.identifier.issn1023-697X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344311-
dc.description.abstractSuper-long escalators that are increasingly used in mega-cities take up a large number of passengers, and so their risk of sudden failure draws serious attention. As a case study, on 25 March 2017, an escalator with a 21 m elevation in Hong Kong’s Langham Place had its main drive chain suddenly snapped by metal fatigue, causing the escalator to reverse at an accelerating speed. A number of passengers were injured. In this paper, two issues will be discussed: (1) whether metal fatigue of the main drive chain can be detected with conventional protocols, and (2) what safety factor is needed to prevent metal fatigue. Analysis shows that initial fatigue cracks in escalator drive chains may not be easily detected with the commonly adopted maintenance protocol. Also, the time window from the emergence of clear signs of fatigue failure to the sudden snapping of the drive chain may be as short as weeks or even days, versus the common safety inspection intervals of six months. The safety factor to prevent metal fatigue of the drive chain should be at least 7, whereas lower values are allowed. The Hong Kong government has since then changed regulations and adopted additional measures to safeguard escalator failures against metal fatigue.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofHKIE Transactions-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectFatigue failure-
dc.subjectMain drive chain-
dc.subjectSafety factor-
dc.subjectSafety regulations-
dc.subjectSuper-long escalators-
dc.titleAre super-long escalators safe? Lessons learned from the Langham place escalator incident in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.33430/V28N1THIE-2019-0029-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85111054666-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage49-
dc.identifier.epage57-
dc.identifier.eissn2326-3733-
dc.identifier.issnl1023-697X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats