File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Three Fluoride Varnishes in Preventing Early Childhood Caries

TitleRandomized Clinical Trial to Compare Three Fluoride Varnishes in Preventing Early Childhood Caries
Authors
KeywordsCalcium fluoride
Child
Dental caries
Fluorides
Pediatric dentistry
Sodium fluoride
Issue Date20-Jun-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 147 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of two 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnishes containing casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) (ClinproTM White) or tricalcium phosphate (TCP) (MI Varnish TM) to the conventional 5% NaF varnish (Duraphat®) in preventing early childhood caries (ECC) in high-risk preschool children.

Methods

A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial recruited healthy 3-4-year-old children (N= 582) having at least one carious lesion (pre-cavitated or cavitated) after obtaining written informed consent from parents. Using a computer-generated random-number table, children were assigned to one of the 3 groups: Control group (n= 196): 5% NaF varnish (Duraphat®) or two test groups: 5% NaF with TCP (ClinproTM White) (n= 193) and 5% NaF varnish with CPP-ACP (MI Varnish TM) (n= 193) to receive quarterly (every 3 months) application over 24 months.

Results

Incidence of new caries over 2 years was 59.2% in MI Varnish TM group (n= 125), 65.1% in the ClinproTM White group (n= 129) and 66.1% in the Duraphat® group (n=127) (p= 0.466). The mean cavitated lesions increment was not significant among the 3 groups (p=0.714), as was the mean increment in non-cavitated carious lesions (p= 0.223). There was no significant difference (p= 0.630) in the distribution of total fluoride varnish applications among the three groups. Also, no significant difference was found in comparison of outcomes among the different number of fluoride varnish applications received by children in each group.

Conclusions

Both calcium- and phosphate-containing NaF varnishes showed similar efficacy against cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions as compared to conventional NaF varnish in high-risk preschool children.

Clinical Significance

Randomized trial provided a crucial opportunity to advance the understanding of the clinical effectiveness of different fluoride varnishes in preventing early childhood caries. Varnishes containing tricalcium phosphate or casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate when compared to sodium fluoride varnish, demonstrated a similar efficacy against early childhood caries in high caries-risk preschool children.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344245
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManchanda, Sheetal-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Pei-
dc.contributor.authorSardana, Divesh-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Simin-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Edward CM-
dc.contributor.authorYiu, Cynthia KY-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T03:41:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-16T03:41:56Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-20-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 147-
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344245-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the effectiveness of two 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnishes containing casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) (ClinproTM White) or tricalcium phosphate (TCP) (MI Varnish TM) to the conventional 5% NaF varnish (Duraphat®) in preventing early childhood caries (ECC) in high-risk preschool children.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial recruited healthy 3-4-year-old children (N= 582) having at least one carious lesion (pre-cavitated or cavitated) after obtaining written informed consent from parents. Using a computer-generated random-number table, children were assigned to one of the 3 groups: Control group (n= 196): 5% NaF varnish (Duraphat®) or two test groups: 5% NaF with TCP (ClinproTM White) (n= 193) and 5% NaF varnish with CPP-ACP (MI Varnish TM) (n= 193) to receive quarterly (every 3 months) application over 24 months.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Incidence of new caries over 2 years was 59.2% in MI Varnish TM group (n= 125), 65.1% in the ClinproTM White group (n= 129) and 66.1% in the Duraphat® group (n=127) (p= 0.466). The mean cavitated lesions increment was not significant among the 3 groups (p=0.714), as was the mean increment in non-cavitated carious lesions (p= 0.223). There was no significant difference (p= 0.630) in the distribution of total fluoride varnish applications among the three groups. Also, no significant difference was found in comparison of outcomes among the different number of fluoride varnish applications received by children in each group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both calcium- and phosphate-containing NaF varnishes showed similar efficacy against cavitated and non-cavitated carious lesions as compared to conventional NaF varnish in high-risk preschool children.</p><h3>Clinical Significance</h3><p>Randomized trial provided a crucial opportunity to advance the understanding of the clinical effectiveness of different fluoride varnishes in preventing early childhood caries. Varnishes containing tricalcium phosphate or casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate when compared to sodium fluoride varnish, demonstrated a similar efficacy against early childhood caries in high caries-risk preschool children.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry-
dc.subjectCalcium fluoride-
dc.subjectChild-
dc.subjectDental caries-
dc.subjectFluorides-
dc.subjectPediatric dentistry-
dc.subjectSodium fluoride-
dc.titleRandomized Clinical Trial to Compare Three Fluoride Varnishes in Preventing Early Childhood Caries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105141-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85197480950-
dc.identifier.volume147-
dc.identifier.issnl0300-5712-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats