File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Current practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling for women with breast and ovarian cancer in Asia

TitleCurrent practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling for women with breast and ovarian cancer in Asia
Authors
KeywordsAsia
breast neoplasms
genetic counseling
genetic testing
ovarian neoplasms
Issue Date22-May-2024
PublisherWiley
Citation
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Aim: This study assesses current practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling (GT and C) for breast cancer gene (BRCA)1/2 mutations in Asia, considering the increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) and breast cancer (BC) in women carrying these mutations. Methods: Insights were gathered through a questionnaire from breast surgeons, gynecologists, oncologists, and genetic clinicians in 10 Asian countries: Thailand, Hong Kong, South Korea, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Singapore, and Indonesia. The questionnaire covered their knowledge, attitudes, and practices in GT and C for BRCA1/2 mutations, along with information on perceived gaps and unmet needs in the region. Results: A total of 61 specialists participated in the survey. GT and C for BRCA1/2 mutations were less frequently offered in Asia compared to Western countries. Among the guidelines used, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines alone or in combination with other guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO], National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE], and European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO]) were preferred for both BC and OC. Limited access to genetic counselors posed a significant challenge, resulting in delayed or no GT. Pretest genetic counseling was provided by the respondents themselves. Germline testing was preferred for BC, whereas both germline and somatic testing were preferred for OC, with the most preferred option being a multipanel germline test. Conclusion: Disparities exist in GT and C practices between Asian and Western countries. To address this, steps, such as patient and doctor education, increased accessibility and affordability of GT and C services, and improved infrastructure for identifying gene mutations, should be taken.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344216
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.531

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwong, Ava-
dc.contributor.authorTan, David S‐P-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Jai Min-
dc.contributor.authorACROSS Consortium-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T03:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-16T03:41:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-22-
dc.identifier.citationAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn1743-7555-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344216-
dc.description.abstract<p>Aim: This study assesses current practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling (GT and C) for breast cancer gene (BRCA)1/2 mutations in Asia, considering the increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) and breast cancer (BC) in women carrying these mutations. Methods: Insights were gathered through a questionnaire from breast surgeons, gynecologists, oncologists, and genetic clinicians in 10 Asian countries: Thailand, Hong Kong, South Korea, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Singapore, and Indonesia. The questionnaire covered their knowledge, attitudes, and practices in GT and C for BRCA1/2 mutations, along with information on perceived gaps and unmet needs in the region. Results: A total of 61 specialists participated in the survey. GT and C for BRCA1/2 mutations were less frequently offered in Asia compared to Western countries. Among the guidelines used, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines alone or in combination with other guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO], National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE], and European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO]) were preferred for both BC and OC. Limited access to genetic counselors posed a significant challenge, resulting in delayed or no GT. Pretest genetic counseling was provided by the respondents themselves. Germline testing was preferred for BC, whereas both germline and somatic testing were preferred for OC, with the most preferred option being a multipanel germline test. Conclusion: Disparities exist in GT and C practices between Asian and Western countries. To address this, steps, such as patient and doctor education, increased accessibility and affordability of GT and C services, and improved infrastructure for identifying gene mutations, should be taken.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAsia-
dc.subjectbreast neoplasms-
dc.subjectgenetic counseling-
dc.subjectgenetic testing-
dc.subjectovarian neoplasms-
dc.titleCurrent practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling for women with breast and ovarian cancer in Asia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajco.14074-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85193852625-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-7563-
dc.identifier.issnl1743-7555-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats