File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Recommendations on Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery. The Paris Jury-Based Consensus Conference

TitleRecommendations on Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery. The Paris Jury-Based Consensus Conference
Authors
Issue Date24-May-2024
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Citation
Annals of Surgery, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective: 

To establish the first consensus guidelines on the safety and indications of robotics in Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary (HPB) surgery. The secondary aim was to identify priorities for future research.

Summary Background Data: 

HPB robotic surgery is reaching the IDEAL 2b exploration phase for innovative technology. An objective assessment endorsed by the HPB community is timely and needed.

Methods: 

The ROBOT4HPB conference developed consensus guidelines using the Zurich-Danish model. An impartial and multidisciplinary jury produced unbiased guidelines based on the work of ten expert panels answering predefined key questions and considering the best-quality evidence retrieved after a systematic review. The recommendations conformed with the GRADE and SIGN50 methodologies.

Results: 

Fifty-four experts from 20 countries considered 285 studies, and the conference included an audience of 220 attendees. The jury (n=10) produced recommendations or statements covering five sections of robotic HPB surgery: technology, training and expertise, outcome assessment, and liver and pancreatic procedures. The recommendations supported the feasibility of robotics for most HPB procedures and its potential value in extending minimally invasive indications, emphasizing however the importance of expertise to ensure safety. The concept of expertise was defined broadly, encompassing requirements for credentialing HPB robotics at a given center. The jury prioritized relevant questions for future trials and emphasized the need for prospective registries, including validated outcome metrics for the forthcoming assessment of HPB robotics.

Conclusion: 

The ROBOT4HPB consensus represents a collaborative and multidisciplinary initiative, defining state-of-the-art expertise in HPB robotics procedures. It produced the first guidelines to encourage their safe use and promotion.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343872
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.729

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHobeika, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorPfister, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorGeller, David-
dc.contributor.authorTsung, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Albert-
dc.contributor.authorTroisi, Roberto Ivan-
dc.contributor.authorRela, Mohamed-
dc.contributor.authorDi Benedetto, Fabrizio-
dc.contributor.authorSucandy, Iswanto-
dc.contributor.authorNagakawa, Yuichi-
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, R Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorKooby, David-
dc.contributor.authorBarkun, Jeffrey-
dc.contributor.authorSoubrane, Olivier-
dc.contributor.authorClavien, Pierre-Alain-
dc.contributor.authoron behalf of the RobotHPB consensus group-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T08:14:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-13T08:14:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-24-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgery, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343872-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objective: </h3><p>To establish the first consensus guidelines on the safety and indications of robotics in Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary (HPB) surgery. The secondary aim was to identify priorities for future research.</p><h3>Summary Background Data: </h3><p>HPB robotic surgery is reaching the IDEAL 2b exploration phase for innovative technology. An objective assessment endorsed by the HPB community is timely and needed.</p><h3>Methods: </h3><p>The ROBOT4HPB conference developed consensus guidelines using the Zurich-Danish model. An impartial and multidisciplinary jury produced unbiased guidelines based on the work of ten expert panels answering predefined key questions and considering the best-quality evidence retrieved after a systematic review. The recommendations conformed with the GRADE and SIGN50 methodologies.</p><h3>Results: </h3><p>Fifty-four experts from 20 countries considered 285 studies, and the conference included an audience of 220 attendees. The jury (n=10) produced recommendations or statements covering five sections of robotic HPB surgery: technology, training and expertise, outcome assessment, and liver and pancreatic procedures. The recommendations supported the feasibility of robotics for most HPB procedures and its potential value in extending minimally invasive indications, emphasizing however the importance of expertise to ensure safety. The concept of expertise was defined broadly, encompassing requirements for credentialing HPB robotics at a given center. The jury prioritized relevant questions for future trials and emphasized the need for prospective registries, including validated outcome metrics for the forthcoming assessment of HPB robotics.</p><h3>Conclusion: </h3><p>The ROBOT4HPB consensus represents a collaborative and multidisciplinary initiative, defining state-of-the-art expertise in HPB robotics procedures. It produced the first guidelines to encourage their safe use and promotion.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Surgery-
dc.titleRecommendations on Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery. The Paris Jury-Based Consensus Conference-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA.0000000000006365-
dc.identifier.eissn1528-1140-
dc.identifier.issnl0003-4932-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats