File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Religiosity and health among Chinese older adults: a meta-analytic review

TitleReligiosity and health among Chinese older adults: a meta-analytic review
Authors
KeywordsChina
meta-analysis
older adults
psycho-social wellbeing
religiosity
Issue Date2022
Citation
Ageing and Society, 2022, v. 42, n. 2, p. 271-305 How to Cite?
AbstractThe ageing population has been rapidly growing over recent years. Theoretically, religion seemingly plays an important role in improving older people's health. This study examines whether believing in religion is related to better health conditions among Chinese older adults through a meta-analysis. Two researchers independently extracted the studies from a comprehensive database and grey literature search and evaluated their scientific quality. From the 3,777 potentially eligible papers, just 76 were selected. The pooled effect size detected no significant difference between Chinese religious and non-religious older adults’ overall health and wellbeing. Dividing the outcomes into different categories, religious older adults reported both a higher level of anxiety (Hedge's g = −0.392, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.494, −0.290; p = 0.004) and yet a higher level of happiness (Hedge's g = 0.342, 95% CI = 0.074, 0.610; p = 0.018). Having a higher proportion of females in the sample is related to a smaller effect size in overall health outcomes (β = −2.205, 95% CI = −3.800, −0.613; p = 0.007) and social support specifically (β = −4.660, 95% CI = −6.261, −3.058; p < 0.0001). This study is among the first to synthesise the quantitative evidence regarding health differences between older religion believers and non-believers in China. It calls for future studies investigating the pathways underlying the religion–health relationship.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343684
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.026

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jia-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qi-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-27T09:29:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-27T09:29:14Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationAgeing and Society, 2022, v. 42, n. 2, p. 271-305-
dc.identifier.issn0144-686X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/343684-
dc.description.abstractThe ageing population has been rapidly growing over recent years. Theoretically, religion seemingly plays an important role in improving older people's health. This study examines whether believing in religion is related to better health conditions among Chinese older adults through a meta-analysis. Two researchers independently extracted the studies from a comprehensive database and grey literature search and evaluated their scientific quality. From the 3,777 potentially eligible papers, just 76 were selected. The pooled effect size detected no significant difference between Chinese religious and non-religious older adults’ overall health and wellbeing. Dividing the outcomes into different categories, religious older adults reported both a higher level of anxiety (Hedge's g = −0.392, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.494, −0.290; p = 0.004) and yet a higher level of happiness (Hedge's g = 0.342, 95% CI = 0.074, 0.610; p = 0.018). Having a higher proportion of females in the sample is related to a smaller effect size in overall health outcomes (β = −2.205, 95% CI = −3.800, −0.613; p = 0.007) and social support specifically (β = −4.660, 95% CI = −6.261, −3.058; p < 0.0001). This study is among the first to synthesise the quantitative evidence regarding health differences between older religion believers and non-believers in China. It calls for future studies investigating the pathways underlying the religion–health relationship.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAgeing and Society-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.subjectolder adults-
dc.subjectpsycho-social wellbeing-
dc.subjectreligiosity-
dc.titleReligiosity and health among Chinese older adults: a meta-analytic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0144686X20000835-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85092492448-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage271-
dc.identifier.epage305-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-1779-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats