File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3389/fncel.2011.00018
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84862600723
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Quantitative comparison of genetically encoded Ca 2+ indicators in cortical pyramidal cells and cerebellar purkinje cells
Title | Quantitative comparison of genetically encoded Ca <sup>2+</sup> indicators in cortical pyramidal cells and cerebellar purkinje cells |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Acute brain slice Adenovirus Cerebellar purkinje cell Cortical pyramidal cell Genetically encoded Ca indicators 2+ Patch-clamp recording Two-photon imaging |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Citation | Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2011, n. SEPTEMBER, p. 1-10 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Genetically encoded Ca 2+ indicators (GECIs) are promising tools for cell type-specific and chronic recording of neuronal activity. In the mammalian central nervous system, however, GECIs have been tested almost exclusively in cortical and hippocampal pyramidal cells, and the usefulness of recently developed GECIs has not been systematically examined in other cell types. Here we expressed the latest series of GECIs, yellow cameleon (YC) 2.60, YC3.60, YC-Nano15, and GCaMP3, in mouse cortical pyramidal cells as well as cerebellar Purkinje cells using in utero injection of recombinant adenoviral vectors. We characterized the performance of the GECIs by simultaneous two-photon imaging and whole-cell patchclamp recording in acute brain slices at 33±2°C. The fluorescent responses of GECIs to action potentials (APs) evoked by somatic current injection or to synaptic stimulation were examined using rapid dendritic imaging. In cortical pyramidal cells, YC2.60 showed the largest responses to single APs, but its decay kinetics were slower than YC3.60 and GCaMP3, while GCaMP3 showed the largest responses to 20APs evoked at 20Hz. In cerebellar Purkinje cells, onlyYC2.60 andYC-Nano15 could reliably report single complex spikes (CSs), and neither showed signal saturation over the entire stimulus range tested (1-10 CSs at 10Hz).The expression and response ofYC2.60 in Purkinje cells remained detectable and comparable for at least over 100days.These results provide useful information for selecting an optimal GECI depending on the experimental requirements: in cortical pyramidal cells, YC2.60 is suitable for detecting sparse firing of APs, whereas GCaMP3 is suitable for detecting burst firing of APs; in cerebellar Purkinje cells, YC2.60 as well as YC-Nano15 is suitable for detecting CSs. © 2011Yamada, Michikawa, Hashimoto, Horikawa, Nagai, Miyawaki, Häusserand Mikoshiba. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/343098 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.471 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yamada, Yoshiyuki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Michikawa, Takayuki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hashimoto, Mitsuhiro | - |
dc.contributor.author | Horikawa, Kazuki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nagai, Takeharu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Miyawaki, Atsushi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Häusser, Michael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mikoshiba, Katsuhiko | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-10T09:05:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-10T09:05:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 2011, n. SEPTEMBER, p. 1-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1662-5102 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/343098 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Genetically encoded Ca 2+ indicators (GECIs) are promising tools for cell type-specific and chronic recording of neuronal activity. In the mammalian central nervous system, however, GECIs have been tested almost exclusively in cortical and hippocampal pyramidal cells, and the usefulness of recently developed GECIs has not been systematically examined in other cell types. Here we expressed the latest series of GECIs, yellow cameleon (YC) 2.60, YC3.60, YC-Nano15, and GCaMP3, in mouse cortical pyramidal cells as well as cerebellar Purkinje cells using in utero injection of recombinant adenoviral vectors. We characterized the performance of the GECIs by simultaneous two-photon imaging and whole-cell patchclamp recording in acute brain slices at 33±2°C. The fluorescent responses of GECIs to action potentials (APs) evoked by somatic current injection or to synaptic stimulation were examined using rapid dendritic imaging. In cortical pyramidal cells, YC2.60 showed the largest responses to single APs, but its decay kinetics were slower than YC3.60 and GCaMP3, while GCaMP3 showed the largest responses to 20APs evoked at 20Hz. In cerebellar Purkinje cells, onlyYC2.60 andYC-Nano15 could reliably report single complex spikes (CSs), and neither showed signal saturation over the entire stimulus range tested (1-10 CSs at 10Hz).The expression and response ofYC2.60 in Purkinje cells remained detectable and comparable for at least over 100days.These results provide useful information for selecting an optimal GECI depending on the experimental requirements: in cortical pyramidal cells, YC2.60 is suitable for detecting sparse firing of APs, whereas GCaMP3 is suitable for detecting burst firing of APs; in cerebellar Purkinje cells, YC2.60 as well as YC-Nano15 is suitable for detecting CSs. © 2011Yamada, Michikawa, Hashimoto, Horikawa, Nagai, Miyawaki, Häusserand Mikoshiba. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | - |
dc.subject | Acute brain slice | - |
dc.subject | Adenovirus | - |
dc.subject | Cerebellar purkinje cell | - |
dc.subject | Cortical pyramidal cell | - |
dc.subject | Genetically encoded Ca indicators 2+ | - |
dc.subject | Patch-clamp recording | - |
dc.subject | Two-photon imaging | - |
dc.title | Quantitative comparison of genetically encoded Ca <sup>2+</sup> indicators in cortical pyramidal cells and cerebellar purkinje cells | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fncel.2011.00018 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84862600723 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | SEPTEMBER | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 10 | - |