File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD)

TitleA study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD)
Authors
Tang, StanleyAkers, ClareAlnajjar, HussainAyres, BenBaldini, CinziaEmbleton-Thirsk, AndrewGurusamy, KurinchiHadway, PaulKumar, VivekanandanLau, MauriceNigam, RajPang, KarlParnham, AriePizzo, ElenaRanieri, VeronicaRees, RowlandSangar, VijayWadke, AnviWilliams, NormanMuneer, Asif
KeywordsLymphadenectomy
Melanoma
Penile cancer
Squamous cell carcinoma
Issue Date10-Apr-2024
PublisherBioMed Central
Citation
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 2024, v. 10, n. 1 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01474-8
Abstract

Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342757
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:001199961400002

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTang, Stanley-
dc.contributor.authorAkers, Clare-
dc.contributor.authorAlnajjar, Hussain-
dc.contributor.authorAyres, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorBaldini, Cinzia-
dc.contributor.authorEmbleton-Thirsk, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorGurusamy, Kurinchi-
dc.contributor.authorHadway, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Vivekanandan-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Maurice-
dc.contributor.authorNigam, Raj-
dc.contributor.authorPang, Karl-
dc.contributor.authorParnham, Arie-
dc.contributor.authorPizzo, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorRanieri, Veronica-
dc.contributor.authorRees, Rowland-
dc.contributor.authorSangar, Vijay-
dc.contributor.authorWadke, Anvi-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Norman-
dc.contributor.authorMuneer, Asif-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T02:46:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-24T02:46:56Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-10-
dc.identifier.citationPilot and Feasibility Studies, 2024, v. 10, n. 1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342757-
dc.description.abstract<p>Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.ispartofPilot and Feasibility Studies-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectLymphadenectomy-
dc.subjectMelanoma-
dc.subjectPenile cancer-
dc.subjectSquamous cell carcinoma-
dc.titleA study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40814-024-01474-8-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85190095881-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn2055-5784-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001199961400002-
dc.identifier.issnl2055-5784-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats