File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Biomarkers and predictive models of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis, and expert panel recommendations

TitleBiomarkers and predictive models of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis, and expert panel recommendations
Authors
Keywordsbiomarker
early allograft dysfunction
lactate
liver transplantation
Issue Date2022
Citation
Clinical Transplantation, 2022, v. 36, n. 10, article no. e14635 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Prompt identification of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is critical to reduce morbidity and mortality in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Objectives: Evaluate the evidence supporting biomarkers that can provide diagnostic and predictive value for EAD. Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. Methods: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach was derived from an international expert panel. Studies that investigated biomarkers or models for predicting EAD in adult LT recipients were included for in-depth evaluation and meta-analysis. Olthoff's criteria were used as the standard reference for the diagnostic accuracy evaluation. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021293838. Results: Ten studies were included for the systematic review. Lactate, lactate clearance, uric acid, Factor V, HMGB-1, CRP to ALB ratio, phosphocholine, total cholesterol, and metabolomic predictive model were identified as potential early EAD predictive biomarkers. The sensitivity ranged between.39 and.92, while the specificity ranged from.63 to.90. Elevated lactate level was most indicative of EAD after adult LT (pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 7.15 (95%CI: 2.38-21.46)). The quality of evidence (QOE) for lactate as indicator was moderate according to the GRADE approach, whereas the QOE for other biomarkers was very low to low likely as consequence of study design characteristics such as single study, small sample size, and large ranges of sensitivity or specificity. Conclusions: Lactate is an early indicator to predict EAD after LT (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong). Further multicenter studies and the use of machine perfusion setting should be implemented for validation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342654
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.753
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jiang-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Paulo N.-
dc.contributor.authorBhat, Mamatha-
dc.contributor.authorPang, Li-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Oscar W.H.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Kevin T.P.-
dc.contributor.authorSpiro, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorRaptis, Dimitri Aristotle-
dc.contributor.authorMan, Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorMas, Valeria R.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-17T07:05:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-17T07:05:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Transplantation, 2022, v. 36, n. 10, article no. e14635-
dc.identifier.issn0902-0063-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342654-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Prompt identification of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is critical to reduce morbidity and mortality in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Objectives: Evaluate the evidence supporting biomarkers that can provide diagnostic and predictive value for EAD. Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. Methods: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach was derived from an international expert panel. Studies that investigated biomarkers or models for predicting EAD in adult LT recipients were included for in-depth evaluation and meta-analysis. Olthoff's criteria were used as the standard reference for the diagnostic accuracy evaluation. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021293838. Results: Ten studies were included for the systematic review. Lactate, lactate clearance, uric acid, Factor V, HMGB-1, CRP to ALB ratio, phosphocholine, total cholesterol, and metabolomic predictive model were identified as potential early EAD predictive biomarkers. The sensitivity ranged between.39 and.92, while the specificity ranged from.63 to.90. Elevated lactate level was most indicative of EAD after adult LT (pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 7.15 (95%CI: 2.38-21.46)). The quality of evidence (QOE) for lactate as indicator was moderate according to the GRADE approach, whereas the QOE for other biomarkers was very low to low likely as consequence of study design characteristics such as single study, small sample size, and large ranges of sensitivity or specificity. Conclusions: Lactate is an early indicator to predict EAD after LT (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong). Further multicenter studies and the use of machine perfusion setting should be implemented for validation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Transplantation-
dc.subjectbiomarker-
dc.subjectearly allograft dysfunction-
dc.subjectlactate-
dc.subjectliver transplantation-
dc.titleBiomarkers and predictive models of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis, and expert panel recommendations-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ctr.14635-
dc.identifier.pmid35291044-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85132324919-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e14635-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e14635-
dc.identifier.eissn1399-0012-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000921945900009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats