File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa114
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85086126630
- PMID: 32170297
- WOS: WOS:000553452200037
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Diabetes screening: Detection and application of saliva 1,5-anhydroglucitol by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
Title | Diabetes screening: Detection and application of saliva 1,5-anhydroglucitol by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | 1,5-anhydroglucitol Diabetes screening Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry Saliva determination |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Citation | Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2020, v. 105, n. 6, p. 1759-1769 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Context: Unlike other commonly used invasive blood glucose-monitoring methods, salivadetection prevents patients from suffering physical uneasiness. However, there are few studieson saliva 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of saliva 1,5-AG in diabetes screeningin a Chinese population.Design and Participants: This was a population-based cross-sectional study. A total of 641subjects without a valid diabetic history were recruited from September 2018 to June 2019.Saliva 1,5-AG was measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.Main outcome measures: DM was defined per American Diabetes Association criteria. Theefficiency of saliva 1,5-AG for diabetes screening was analyzed by receiver operating characteristiccurves, and the optimal cutoff point was determined according to the Youden index.Results: Saliva 1,5-AG levels in subjects with DM were lower than those in subjects who didnot have DM (both P <.05). Saliva 1,5-AG was positively correlated with serum 1,5-AG andnegatively correlated with blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (all P <.05). Theoptimal cutoff points of saliva 1,5-AG0 and 1,5-AG120 for diabetes screening were 0.436 μ g/mL (sensitivity: 63.58%, specificity: 60.61%) and 0.438 μ g/mL (sensitivity: 62.25%, specificity:60.41%), respectively. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) combined with fasting saliva 1,5-AG reducedthe proportion of people who required an oral glucose tolerance test by 47.22% compared withFPG alone.Conclusion: Saliva 1,5-AG combined with FPG or HbA1c improved the efficiency of diabetesscreening. Saliva 1,5-AG is robust in nonfasting measurements and a noninvasive andconvenient tool for diabetes screening. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/342247 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.899 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jian, Chaohui | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Aihua | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, Xiaojing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ge, Kun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Wei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhu, Wei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yufei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Jian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jia, Wei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bao, Yuqian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-17T07:02:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-17T07:02:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2020, v. 105, n. 6, p. 1759-1769 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-972X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/342247 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Context: Unlike other commonly used invasive blood glucose-monitoring methods, salivadetection prevents patients from suffering physical uneasiness. However, there are few studieson saliva 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of saliva 1,5-AG in diabetes screeningin a Chinese population.Design and Participants: This was a population-based cross-sectional study. A total of 641subjects without a valid diabetic history were recruited from September 2018 to June 2019.Saliva 1,5-AG was measured with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.Main outcome measures: DM was defined per American Diabetes Association criteria. Theefficiency of saliva 1,5-AG for diabetes screening was analyzed by receiver operating characteristiccurves, and the optimal cutoff point was determined according to the Youden index.Results: Saliva 1,5-AG levels in subjects with DM were lower than those in subjects who didnot have DM (both P <.05). Saliva 1,5-AG was positively correlated with serum 1,5-AG andnegatively correlated with blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (all P <.05). Theoptimal cutoff points of saliva 1,5-AG0 and 1,5-AG120 for diabetes screening were 0.436 μ g/mL (sensitivity: 63.58%, specificity: 60.61%) and 0.438 μ g/mL (sensitivity: 62.25%, specificity:60.41%), respectively. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) combined with fasting saliva 1,5-AG reducedthe proportion of people who required an oral glucose tolerance test by 47.22% compared withFPG alone.Conclusion: Saliva 1,5-AG combined with FPG or HbA1c improved the efficiency of diabetesscreening. Saliva 1,5-AG is robust in nonfasting measurements and a noninvasive andconvenient tool for diabetes screening. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | - |
dc.subject | 1,5-anhydroglucitol | - |
dc.subject | Diabetes screening | - |
dc.subject | Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry | - |
dc.subject | Saliva determination | - |
dc.title | Diabetes screening: Detection and application of saliva 1,5-anhydroglucitol by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1210/clinem/dgaa114 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32170297 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85086126630 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 105 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1759 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1769 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1945-7197 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000553452200037 | - |