File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effectiveness of simulation models and digital alternatives in training ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review

TitleEffectiveness of simulation models and digital alternatives in training ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review
Authors
Issue Date27-Mar-2024
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Medical Teacher, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose 

Traditional direct ophthalmoscopy (TDO) is the oldest method of fundus examination; however, it has fallen out of use due to its technical difficulty and limitations to clinical utility, amidst the advent of potentially better options. A spectrum of new technologies may help in addressing the shortcomings of TDO: simulation mannequins with non-tracked TDO, simulation models with tracked TDO, and smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO).

Methodology 

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for all studies evaluating usage of simulation mannequins/models and SFO in ophthalmology education was performed, from inception till April 2023 with no language restriction. We ensured that we included all possible relevant articles by performing backward reference searching of included articles and published review articles.

Results 

We reviewed studies on non-tracked TDO (n = 5), tracked TDO (n = 3) and SFO (n = 12). Non-tracked TDO and SFO were superior in training competency relative to control (TDO on real eyes). Intriguingly, tracked TDO was non superior to controls. SFO appears to enhance the learning effectiveness of ophthalmoscopy, due to real-time projection of the retina view, permitting instantaneous and targeted feedback. Learners reported improved ergonomics, including a wider field of view and more comfortable viewing distance. Retention of images and recordings permitted the audit of learning and paves the way for storage of such images in patients’ electronic medical record and rapid dissemination for specialist referral.

Conclusions 

Smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO) permits integration of both the practice and learning of ophthalmoscopy, and the auditing of both. These advantages over traditional methods (with simulation or otherwise) may lead to a paradigm shift in undergraduate ophthalmology education. However, the nascency of SFO necessitates preservation of traditional techniques to tide through this period of transition.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342119
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.380

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorNgai, Nicole Tze-Yan-
dc.contributor.authorRhee, Jess-
dc.contributor.authorShih, Kendrick Co-
dc.contributor.authorAlam, Khyber-
dc.contributor.authorTong, Louis-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T08:25:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-02T08:25:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-27-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Teacher, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0142-159X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/342119-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Purpose </h3><p>Traditional direct ophthalmoscopy (TDO) is the oldest method of fundus examination; however, it has fallen out of use due to its technical difficulty and limitations to clinical utility, amidst the advent of potentially better options. A spectrum of new technologies may help in addressing the shortcomings of TDO: simulation mannequins with non-tracked TDO, simulation models with tracked TDO, and smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO).</p><h3>Methodology </h3><p>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for all studies evaluating usage of simulation mannequins/models and SFO in ophthalmology education was performed, from inception till April 2023 with no language restriction. We ensured that we included all possible relevant articles by performing backward reference searching of included articles and published review articles.</p><h3>Results </h3><p>We reviewed studies on non-tracked TDO (<em>n</em> = 5), tracked TDO (<em>n</em> = 3) and SFO (<em>n</em> = 12). Non-tracked TDO and SFO were superior in training competency relative to control (TDO on real eyes). Intriguingly, tracked TDO was non superior to controls. SFO appears to enhance the learning effectiveness of ophthalmoscopy, due to real-time projection of the retina view, permitting instantaneous and targeted feedback. Learners reported improved ergonomics, including a wider field of view and more comfortable viewing distance. Retention of images and recordings permitted the audit of learning and paves the way for storage of such images in patients’ electronic medical record and rapid dissemination for specialist referral.</p><h3>Conclusions </h3><p>Smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO) permits integration of both the practice and learning of ophthalmoscopy, and the auditing of both. These advantages over traditional methods (with simulation or otherwise) may lead to a paradigm shift in undergraduate ophthalmology education. However, the nascency of SFO necessitates preservation of traditional techniques to tide through this period of transition.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Teacher-
dc.titleEffectiveness of simulation models and digital alternatives in training ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0142159X.2024.2326112-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-187X-
dc.identifier.issnl0142-159X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats