File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2326112
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effectiveness of simulation models and digital alternatives in training ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review
Title | Effectiveness of simulation models and digital alternatives in training ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 27-Mar-2024 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Citation | Medical Teacher, 2024 How to Cite? |
Abstract | PurposeTraditional direct ophthalmoscopy (TDO) is the oldest method of fundus examination; however, it has fallen out of use due to its technical difficulty and limitations to clinical utility, amidst the advent of potentially better options. A spectrum of new technologies may help in addressing the shortcomings of TDO: simulation mannequins with non-tracked TDO, simulation models with tracked TDO, and smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO). MethodologyA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for all studies evaluating usage of simulation mannequins/models and SFO in ophthalmology education was performed, from inception till April 2023 with no language restriction. We ensured that we included all possible relevant articles by performing backward reference searching of included articles and published review articles. ResultsWe reviewed studies on non-tracked TDO (n = 5), tracked TDO (n = 3) and SFO (n = 12). Non-tracked TDO and SFO were superior in training competency relative to control (TDO on real eyes). Intriguingly, tracked TDO was non superior to controls. SFO appears to enhance the learning effectiveness of ophthalmoscopy, due to real-time projection of the retina view, permitting instantaneous and targeted feedback. Learners reported improved ergonomics, including a wider field of view and more comfortable viewing distance. Retention of images and recordings permitted the audit of learning and paves the way for storage of such images in patients’ electronic medical record and rapid dissemination for specialist referral. ConclusionsSmartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO) permits integration of both the practice and learning of ophthalmoscopy, and the auditing of both. These advantages over traditional methods (with simulation or otherwise) may lead to a paradigm shift in undergraduate ophthalmology education. However, the nascency of SFO necessitates preservation of traditional techniques to tide through this period of transition. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/342119 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.380 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Paik, Benjamin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ngai, Nicole Tze-Yan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rhee, Jess | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shih, Kendrick Co | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alam, Khyber | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tong, Louis | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-02T08:25:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-02T08:25:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-27 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Medical Teacher, 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0142-159X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/342119 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Purpose </h3><p>Traditional direct ophthalmoscopy (TDO) is the oldest method of fundus examination; however, it has fallen out of use due to its technical difficulty and limitations to clinical utility, amidst the advent of potentially better options. A spectrum of new technologies may help in addressing the shortcomings of TDO: simulation mannequins with non-tracked TDO, simulation models with tracked TDO, and smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO).</p><h3>Methodology </h3><p>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for all studies evaluating usage of simulation mannequins/models and SFO in ophthalmology education was performed, from inception till April 2023 with no language restriction. We ensured that we included all possible relevant articles by performing backward reference searching of included articles and published review articles.</p><h3>Results </h3><p>We reviewed studies on non-tracked TDO (<em>n</em> = 5), tracked TDO (<em>n</em> = 3) and SFO (<em>n</em> = 12). Non-tracked TDO and SFO were superior in training competency relative to control (TDO on real eyes). Intriguingly, tracked TDO was non superior to controls. SFO appears to enhance the learning effectiveness of ophthalmoscopy, due to real-time projection of the retina view, permitting instantaneous and targeted feedback. Learners reported improved ergonomics, including a wider field of view and more comfortable viewing distance. Retention of images and recordings permitted the audit of learning and paves the way for storage of such images in patients’ electronic medical record and rapid dissemination for specialist referral.</p><h3>Conclusions </h3><p>Smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SFO) permits integration of both the practice and learning of ophthalmoscopy, and the auditing of both. These advantages over traditional methods (with simulation or otherwise) may lead to a paradigm shift in undergraduate ophthalmology education. However, the nascency of SFO necessitates preservation of traditional techniques to tide through this period of transition.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Medical Teacher | - |
dc.title | Effectiveness of simulation models and digital alternatives in training ophthalmoscopy: A systematic review | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2326112 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1466-187X | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0142-159X | - |