File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

TitlePrevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsCancer nursing
Cancer-related cognitive impairment
Meta-analysis
Prevalence
Issue Date5-Mar-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024, v. 32, n. 4 How to Cite?
Abstract

Purpose

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant risk factor influencing the quality of life in lung cancer survivors. No absolute assessment tool has been confirmed to assess CRCI in lung cancer survivors. This review was undertaken to pool the overall prevalence of CRCI and to summarize the assessment tools in assessing CRCI among lung cancer survivors.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and CNKI were searched to retrieve articles reported CRCI prevalence. Summary prevalence estimates were pooled using a random effects model, along with corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs). The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions was incorporated in the analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and leave-one-out analysis were performed.

Results

A total of 12 studies, involving 1934 survivors, were included in the review. All of these studies were found to have a low risk of bias in terms of their methodological quality. Four studies (33.3%) utilized the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) criteria to identify CRCI through neuropsychological tests. The pooled prevalence rate of CRCI was found to be 26% (95% PI, 16–37%), I2 = 95.97%. The region in which the studies were conducted was identified as a significant factor contributing to this heterogeneity (p = 0.013). No indication of small-study effects was found (Egger’s test: p = 0.9191).

Conclusion

This review provides an overview of CRCI prevalence and assessment tools in lung cancer survivors. The findings can serve as epidemiological evidence to enhance clinicians’ and researchers’ understanding of early detection and assessment.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341736
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.359
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.133

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, Mu-Hsing-
dc.contributor.authorSo, Tsz Wei-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Chun Lun-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Yiu Tak-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chia-Chin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T06:58:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-20T06:58:39Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-05-
dc.identifier.citationSupportive Care in Cancer, 2024, v. 32, n. 4-
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341736-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Purpose</h3><p>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant risk factor influencing the quality of life in lung cancer survivors. No absolute assessment tool has been confirmed to assess CRCI in lung cancer survivors. This review was undertaken to pool the overall prevalence of CRCI and to summarize the assessment tools in assessing CRCI among lung cancer survivors.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and CNKI were searched to retrieve articles reported CRCI prevalence. Summary prevalence estimates were pooled using a random effects model, along with corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs). The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions was incorporated in the analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and leave-one-out analysis were performed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 12 studies, involving 1934 survivors, were included in the review. All of these studies were found to have a low risk of bias in terms of their methodological quality. Four studies (33.3%) utilized the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) criteria to identify CRCI through neuropsychological tests. The pooled prevalence rate of CRCI was found to be 26% (95% PI, 16–37%), <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 95.97%. The region in which the studies were conducted was identified as a significant factor contributing to this heterogeneity (<em>p</em> = 0.013). No indication of small-study effects was found (Egger’s test: <em>p</em> = 0.9191).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review provides an overview of CRCI prevalence and assessment tools in lung cancer survivors. The findings can serve as epidemiological evidence to enhance clinicians’ and researchers’ understanding of early detection and assessment.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofSupportive Care in Cancer-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCancer nursing-
dc.subjectCancer-related cognitive impairment-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectPrevalence-
dc.titlePrevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-024-08402-9-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85186840552-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.eissn1433-7339-
dc.identifier.issnl0941-4355-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats