File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1038/s41537-023-00392-7
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85172222294
- WOS: WOS:001195216800001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia
Title | A systematic review of neuroimaging studies of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 26-Sep-2023 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
Citation | Schizophrenia, 2023, v. 9, n. 1 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This systematic review aimed to review neuroimaging studies comparing clozapine-resistant schizophrenia patients with clozapine-responding patients, and with first-line antipsychotic responding (FLR) patients. A total of 19 studies including 6 longitudinal studies were identified. Imaging techniques comprised computerized tomography (CT, n = 3), structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, n = 7), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS, n = 5), functional MRI (n = 1), single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT, n = 3) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI, n = 1). The most consistent finding was hypo-frontality in the clozapine-resistant group compared with the clozapine-responding group with possible differences in frontal-striatal-basal ganglia circuitry as well as the GABA level between the two treatment-resistant groups. Additional statistically significant findings were reported when comparing clozapine-resistant patients with the FLR group, including lower cortical thickness and brain volume of multiple brain regions as well as lower Glx/Cr level in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Both treatment-resistant groups were found to have extensive differences in neurobiological features in comparison with the FLR group. Overall results suggested treatment-resistant schizophrenia is likely to be a neurobiological distinct type of the illness. Clozapine-resistant and clozapine-responding schizophrenia are likely to have both shared and distinct neurobiological features. However, conclusions from existing studies are limited, and future multi-center collaborative studies are required with a consensus clinical definition of patient samples, multimodal imaging tools, and longitudinal study designs. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/341650 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pang, TSW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chun, JSW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, TY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, ST | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, CF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Honer, WG | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, SKW | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T06:58:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T06:58:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-26 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Schizophrenia, 2023, v. 9, n. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2754-6993 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/341650 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This systematic review aimed to review neuroimaging studies comparing clozapine-resistant schizophrenia patients with clozapine-responding patients, and with first-line antipsychotic responding (FLR) patients. A total of 19 studies including 6 longitudinal studies were identified. Imaging techniques comprised computerized tomography (CT, n = 3), structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, n = 7), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS, n = 5), functional MRI (n = 1), single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT, n = 3) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI, n = 1). The most consistent finding was hypo-frontality in the clozapine-resistant group compared with the clozapine-responding group with possible differences in frontal-striatal-basal ganglia circuitry as well as the GABA level between the two treatment-resistant groups. Additional statistically significant findings were reported when comparing clozapine-resistant patients with the FLR group, including lower cortical thickness and brain volume of multiple brain regions as well as lower Glx/Cr level in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Both treatment-resistant groups were found to have extensive differences in neurobiological features in comparison with the FLR group. Overall results suggested treatment-resistant schizophrenia is likely to be a neurobiological distinct type of the illness. Clozapine-resistant and clozapine-responding schizophrenia are likely to have both shared and distinct neurobiological features. However, conclusions from existing studies are limited, and future multi-center collaborative studies are required with a consensus clinical definition of patient samples, multimodal imaging tools, and longitudinal study designs. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Schizophrenia | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.title | A systematic review of neuroimaging studies of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41537-023-00392-7 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85172222294 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2754-6993 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001195216800001 | - |