File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Incidence of back pain from initial presentation to 3 years of follow-up in subjects with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

TitleIncidence of back pain from initial presentation to 3 years of follow-up in subjects with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
KeywordsAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Back pain
Conservative treatment
Incidence
Natural history
Issue Date28-Nov-2023
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Spine Deformity, 2023, v. 12, p. 357-365 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Intercoder reliability is a statistic commonly reported by researchers to demonstrate the rigour of coding procedures during data analysis. Its importance is debatable in the analysis of qualitative interview data. It raises a question on whether researchers should identify the same codes and themes in a transcript or they should produce different accounts in analyzing the transcript.

Purpose

This study reports how articles in four science education journals, International Journal of Science Education, Research in Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education report intercoder reliability in their analysis of interview data.

Methods

This article explores whether 103 papers published in these science education journals in a single year (2019) have reported intercoder reliability test when the authors analyse their interview data. It was found that 19 papers have reported the test results.

Findings

The authors of these studies have different interpretation towards a similar value of intercoder reliability. Moreover, the percentage of data used in the intercoder reliability test and the identity of intercoder vary across the studies. As a result, this paper aims to raise an issue on whether a replicability of coding can show the reliability of the results when researchers analyze interview data.

Conclusion

We propose two major principles when authors report the reliability of the analysis of interview data: transparency and explanatory. We also argue that only when the authors report intercoder reliability test results that are based on these two principles, the reliability statistics of studies are convincing to readers. Some suggestions are offered to authors regarding how to carry out, analyze and report the intercoder reliability test.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339433
ISSN
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.716

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, Kenney Ki Lee-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, Kenny Yat Hong-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Jason Pui Yin-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Janus Siu Him-
dc.contributor.authorShea, Graham Ka Hon-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Karlen Ka Pui-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Kenneth Man Chee-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:36:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:36:34Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-28-
dc.identifier.citationSpine Deformity, 2023, v. 12, p. 357-365-
dc.identifier.issn2212-134X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339433-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Intercoder reliability is a statistic commonly reported by researchers to demonstrate the rigour of coding procedures during data analysis. Its importance is debatable in the analysis of qualitative interview data. It raises a question on whether researchers should identify the same codes and themes in a transcript or they should produce different accounts in analyzing the transcript.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study reports how articles in four science education journals, <em>International Journal of Science Education, Research in Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching</em> and <em>Science Education</em> report intercoder reliability in their analysis of interview data.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This article explores whether 103 papers published in these science education journals in a single year (2019) have reported intercoder reliability test when the authors analyse their interview data. It was found that 19 papers have reported the test results.</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>The authors of these studies have different interpretation towards a similar value of intercoder reliability. Moreover, the percentage of data used in the intercoder reliability test and the identity of intercoder vary across the studies. As a result, this paper aims to raise an issue on whether a replicability of coding can show the reliability of the results when researchers analyze interview data.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We propose two major principles when authors report the reliability of the analysis of interview data: <em>transparency</em> and <em>explanatory</em>. We also argue that only when the authors report intercoder reliability test results that are based on these two principles, the reliability statistics of studies are convincing to readers. Some suggestions are offered to authors regarding how to carry out, analyze and report the intercoder reliability test.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofSpine Deformity-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis-
dc.subjectBack pain-
dc.subjectConservative treatment-
dc.subjectIncidence-
dc.subjectNatural history-
dc.titleIncidence of back pain from initial presentation to 3 years of follow-up in subjects with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s43390-023-00794-8-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85177771673-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.spage357-
dc.identifier.epage365-
dc.identifier.eissn2212-1358-
dc.identifier.issnl2212-134X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats