File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with vaccine hesitancy – results from a longitudinal study in Singapore

TitleSociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with vaccine hesitancy – results from a longitudinal study in Singapore
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19
multi-ethnic
psychosocial factors
Vaccine hesitancy
vaccine hesitancy scale
Issue Date25-Jul-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 2023, v. 19, n. 2 How to Cite?
Abstract

Singapore has one of the highest COVID-19 vaccination rates, however identifying vaccine-hesitant sub-groups and their concerns is vital given the need for future boosters in vulnerable populations. Furthermore, vaccine hesitancy remains a concern in the event of an emergence of a newer strain that necessitates the rolling out of a new vaccination programme. The aims of this study were to establish the extent of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and the factors influencing it among adults in Singapore using the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS). The study used a longitudinal methodology and participants were recruited in two waves from May 2020 to Sep 2022. In all 858 participants agreed to participate in both waves of the study. The two-factor structure of the VHS scale as established in earlier studies was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The results revealed a two-factor structure of VHS comprising “lack of confidence” and “risks”. Those who had higher stress, resilience, and concerns that they might be infected with COVID-19 at wave 1 were significantly associated with lower ‘lack of confidence’ scores i.e. lower vaccine hesitancy. In comparison, those with higher concerns about inadequate government preventive measures and unemployment at wave 1 were significantly associated with higher ‘lack of confidence’ scores. Those with higher concerns about inadequate government preventive measures in wave 1 were significantly associated with higher ‘risks’ scores i.e. higher vaccine hesitancy. The findings point toward the need for a nuanced messaging that considers the fears expressed by the populace and addresses them directly using clear simple language.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339145
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.927
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Mythily-
dc.contributor.authorAbdin, Edimansyah-
dc.contributor.authorShafie, Saleha-
dc.contributor.authorShahwan, Shazana-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yunjue-
dc.contributor.authorSatghare, Pratika-
dc.contributor.authorDevi, Fiona-
dc.contributor.authorLun, Phyllis-
dc.contributor.authorNi, Michael Yuxuan-
dc.contributor.authorChong, Siow Ann -
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:34:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:34:14Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-25-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 2023, v. 19, n. 2-
dc.identifier.issn2164-5515-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339145-
dc.description.abstract<p>Singapore has one of the highest COVID-19 vaccination rates, however identifying vaccine-hesitant sub-groups and their concerns is vital given the need for future boosters in vulnerable populations. Furthermore, vaccine hesitancy remains a concern in the event of an emergence of a newer strain that necessitates the rolling out of a new vaccination programme. The aims of this study were to establish the extent of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and the factors influencing it among adults in Singapore using the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS). The study used a longitudinal methodology and participants were recruited in two waves from May 2020 to Sep 2022. In all 858 participants agreed to participate in both waves of the study. The two-factor structure of the VHS scale as established in earlier studies was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The results revealed a two-factor structure of VHS comprising “lack of confidence” and “risks”. Those who had higher stress, resilience, and concerns that they might be infected with COVID-19 at wave 1 were significantly associated with lower ‘lack of confidence’ scores i.e. lower vaccine hesitancy. In comparison, those with higher concerns about inadequate government preventive measures and unemployment at wave 1 were significantly associated with higher ‘lack of confidence’ scores. Those with higher concerns about inadequate government preventive measures in wave 1 were significantly associated with higher ‘risks’ scores i.e. higher vaccine hesitancy. The findings point toward the need for a nuanced messaging that considers the fears expressed by the populace and addresses them directly using clear simple language.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectmulti-ethnic-
dc.subjectpsychosocial factors-
dc.subjectVaccine hesitancy-
dc.subjectvaccine hesitancy scale-
dc.titleSociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with vaccine hesitancy – results from a longitudinal study in Singapore-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21645515.2023.2235964-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85165619048-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.eissn2164-554X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001035433300001-
dc.identifier.issnl2164-5515-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats