File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/978-981-19-8784-7_9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85163621968
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Legalist Confucianism: What’s Living and What’s Dead
Title | Legalist Confucianism: What’s Living and What’s Dead |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Anti-corruption Confucianism COVID-19 Drunk driving Legalism |
Issue Date | 1-Jan-2023 |
Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
Abstract | Confucianism and Legalism are the two most influential political traditions in Chinese history. They are diverse and complex traditions with different interpretations in different times (especially in the case of Confucianism), but there are continuities and commonalities and ongoing themes in each tradition. Although the two traditions contrast with each other at the level of philosophy, they were combined in different ways in Chinese imperial history and some form of Legalist Confucianism continues to be influential in the twenty-first century. In this essay, I will identify the main traits of the Confucian and Legalist traditions and show how they were combined in Chinese history. I hope the reader will forgive the broad brushstrokes that simplify a complex history. My aim here is to set the stage for the normative question: Which aspects of Legalist Confucianism should be promoted in the future and which parts should be consigned to the dustbin of history? I will illustrate my response with examples from contemporary China to suggest it is both possible and desirable to promote a form of Legalist Confucianism today and in the foreseeable future. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338848 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bell, DA | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:32:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:32:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789811987847 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338848 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Confucianism and Legalism are the two most influential political traditions in Chinese history. They are diverse and complex traditions with different interpretations in different times (especially in the case of Confucianism), but there are continuities and commonalities and ongoing themes in each tradition. Although the two traditions contrast with each other at the level of philosophy, they were combined in different ways in Chinese imperial history and some form of Legalist Confucianism continues to be influential in the twenty-first century. In this essay, I will identify the main traits of the Confucian and Legalist traditions and show how they were combined in Chinese history. I hope the reader will forgive the broad brushstrokes that simplify a complex history. My aim here is to set the stage for the normative question: Which aspects of Legalist Confucianism should be promoted in the future and which parts should be consigned to the dustbin of history? I will illustrate my response with examples from contemporary China to suggest it is both possible and desirable to promote a form of Legalist Confucianism today and in the foreseeable future. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Palgrave Macmillan | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The long East Asia: the premodern state and its contemporary impacts | - |
dc.subject | Anti-corruption | - |
dc.subject | Confucianism | - |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
dc.subject | Drunk driving | - |
dc.subject | Legalism | - |
dc.title | Legalist Confucianism: What’s Living and What’s Dead | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-981-19-8784-7_9 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85163621968 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | Part F642 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 231 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 248 | - |