File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.2166/BGS.2022.005
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85134316607
- WOS: WOS:000817006200001
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Can green city branding support China's Sponge City Programme?
Title | Can green city branding support China's Sponge City Programme? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Blue-Green Infrastructure city branding Payment for Ecosystem Services sustainable drainage urban competitiveness |
Issue Date | 1-Jun-2022 |
Publisher | IWA Publishing |
Citation | Blue-Green Systems, 2022, v. 4, n. 1, p. 24-44 How to Cite? |
Abstract | China's Sponge City Programme (SCP) is one of the world's most ambitious sustainable urban drainage programmes. By 2030, Chinese cities must have 80% of their land drained by Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) to build critically needed flood resilience. Costs must be met from municipal and private finance, but BGI lacks the revenue streams of public assets like utilities, so has limited appeal to public-private partnerships. Finance options, including Green Bonds targeting institutional investors, and Payment for Urban Ecosystem Service schemes targeting local citizens and businesses, need developing. Green city branding could lever such finance but despite widespread use of green branding to attract investment, sponge branding strategies are immature, and alignment is needed in green branding between sponge project type (e.g., flagship and retrofit), financial instrument, and target financier, to develop differentiated brands that appeal to a diversity of SCP investors. With little grassroots input into city branding, and SCP problems of green gentrification, local support for SCP implementation may be at risk. This is concerning, because cities need local citizens and businesses to invest in the SCP to achieve the extensive retrofit needed, as retrofit (using small-scale BGI such as stormwater planters, de-paving, and raingardens) has little appeal for institutional investors. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338804 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mitchell, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, FKS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, WY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thadani, DR | - |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, GM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Z | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, X | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mullins, MT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chau, PYK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:31:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:31:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Blue-Green Systems, 2022, v. 4, n. 1, p. 24-44 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338804 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>China's Sponge City Programme (SCP) is one of the world's most ambitious sustainable urban drainage programmes. By 2030, Chinese cities must have 80% of their land drained by Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) to build critically needed flood resilience. Costs must be met from municipal and private finance, but BGI lacks the revenue streams of public assets like utilities, so has limited appeal to public-private partnerships. Finance options, including Green Bonds targeting institutional investors, and Payment for Urban Ecosystem Service schemes targeting local citizens and businesses, need developing. Green city branding could lever such finance but despite widespread use of green branding to attract investment, sponge branding strategies are immature, and alignment is needed in green branding between sponge project type (e.g., flagship and retrofit), financial instrument, and target financier, to develop differentiated brands that appeal to a diversity of SCP investors. With little grassroots input into city branding, and SCP problems of green gentrification, local support for SCP implementation may be at risk. This is concerning, because cities need local citizens and businesses to invest in the SCP to achieve the extensive retrofit needed, as retrofit (using small-scale BGI such as stormwater planters, de-paving, and raingardens) has little appeal for institutional investors.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | IWA Publishing | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Blue-Green Systems | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Blue-Green Infrastructure | - |
dc.subject | city branding | - |
dc.subject | Payment for Ecosystem Services | - |
dc.subject | sustainable drainage | - |
dc.subject | urban competitiveness | - |
dc.title | Can green city branding support China's Sponge City Programme? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2166/BGS.2022.005 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85134316607 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 24 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 44 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2617-4782 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000817006200001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2617-4782 | - |