File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of dental students' clinical communication skills from three perspective approaches: A cross‐sectional study

TitleEvaluation of dental students' clinical communication skills from three perspective approaches: A cross‐sectional study
Authors
Keywordsclinical
communication skills
three-perspective approach
Issue Date30-May-2023
PublisherWiley
Citation
European Journal of Dental Education, 2023, v. 28, n. 1, p. 106-113 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction: The communication skills of clinicians are very crucial in providing better health outcomes for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to assess undergraduate dental students' communication skills in relation to their demographics and clinical setting using a three-perspective approach; the student, the patient and the clinical instructor perspective.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using validated modified-communication tools; Patient Communication Assessment Instruments (PCAI), Student Communication Assessment Instruments (SCAI) and Clinical Communication Assessment Instruments (CCAI) which included four communication domains. One hundred and seventy-six undergraduate clinical year students were recruited in this study whereby each of them was assessed by a clinical instructor and a randomly selected patient in two settings: Dental Health Education (DHE) and Comprehensive Care (CC) clinic.

Results: Comparing the three perspectives, PCAI yielded the highest scores across all domains, followed by SCAI and CCAI (p < .001). SCAI exhibited a better score in Year 5 compared to Year 3 and Year 4 (p = .027). The male students perceived they performed better than females in all domains (p < .05). Patients rated the students higher in the DHE clinic as compared to the CC clinic for the team interaction domain.

Conclusion: There was an upward pattern of the communication skills score rated from the clinical instructor perspective to the student and patient perspectives. The use of PCAI, SCAI and CCAI collectively gave a complementary view of students' communication performance in all the domains assessed.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338723
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.633
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAb Ghani, Siti Mariam-
dc.contributor.authorMohd Khairuddin, Puteri Nurul Adila-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Tong Wah-
dc.contributor.authorMd Sabri, Budi Aslinie-
dc.contributor.authorAbdul Hamid, Nor Faharina-
dc.contributor.authorBaharuddin, Izyan Hazwani-
dc.contributor.authorSchonwetter, Dieter-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:31:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:31:03Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-30-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Dental Education, 2023, v. 28, n. 1, p. 106-113-
dc.identifier.issn1396-5883-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338723-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The communication skills of clinicians are very crucial in providing better health outcomes for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to assess undergraduate dental students' communication skills in relation to their demographics and clinical setting using a three-perspective approach; the student, the patient and the clinical instructor perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using validated modified-communication tools; Patient Communication Assessment Instruments (PCAI), Student Communication Assessment Instruments (SCAI) and Clinical Communication Assessment Instruments (CCAI) which included four communication domains. One hundred and seventy-six undergraduate clinical year students were recruited in this study whereby each of them was assessed by a clinical instructor and a randomly selected patient in two settings: Dental Health Education (DHE) and Comprehensive Care (CC) clinic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing the three perspectives, PCAI yielded the highest scores across all domains, followed by SCAI and CCAI (p < .001). SCAI exhibited a better score in Year 5 compared to Year 3 and Year 4 (p = .027). The male students perceived they performed better than females in all domains (p < .05). Patients rated the students higher in the DHE clinic as compared to the CC clinic for the team interaction domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an upward pattern of the communication skills score rated from the clinical instructor perspective to the student and patient perspectives. The use of PCAI, SCAI and CCAI collectively gave a complementary view of students' communication performance in all the domains assessed.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dental Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectclinical-
dc.subjectcommunication skills-
dc.subjectthree-perspective approach-
dc.titleEvaluation of dental students' clinical communication skills from three perspective approaches: A cross‐sectional study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eje.12925-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85161352210-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage106-
dc.identifier.epage113-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0579-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000999390100001-
dc.identifier.issnl1396-5883-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats