File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Scholarship in Times of Constitutional Transformation: a View from Hong Kong

TitleScholarship in Times of Constitutional Transformation: a View from Hong Kong
Authors
Keywordsacademic freedom
China
democratic backsliding
Hong Kong
Hong Kong National Security Law
scholactivism
Issue Date1-Mar-2024
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
Human Rights Law Review, 2024, v. 24, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Hong Kong's constitutional order has been undergoing a momentous transformation since 2020. The introduction of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the use of a plethora of other security tools have pushed Hong Kong's largely liberal legal order in an increasingly authoritarian direction. This article examines the implications of these changes for academic freedom in the territory. Through the lens of Hong Kong, it examines the unique challenges facing constitutional law scholars in authoritarian or liberal backsliding contexts, as well as the distinct contributions they can make. It concludes with reflections on the relevance of arguments against `scholactivism' to authoritarian contexts. The analysis in this article will help us to understand what scholars should and can do in politically volatile environments more generally.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338632
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.419
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cora-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Rights Law Review, 2024, v. 24, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1461-7781-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338632-
dc.description.abstract<p>Hong Kong's constitutional order has been undergoing a momentous transformation since 2020. The introduction of the Hong Kong National Security Law and the use of a plethora of other security tools have pushed Hong Kong's largely liberal legal order in an increasingly authoritarian direction. This article examines the implications of these changes for academic freedom in the territory. Through the lens of Hong Kong, it examines the unique challenges facing constitutional law scholars in authoritarian or liberal backsliding contexts, as well as the distinct contributions they can make. It concludes with reflections on the relevance of arguments against `scholactivism' to authoritarian contexts. The analysis in this article will help us to understand what scholars should and can do in politically volatile environments more generally.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Rights Law Review-
dc.subjectacademic freedom-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectdemocratic backsliding-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectHong Kong National Security Law-
dc.subjectscholactivism-
dc.titleScholarship in Times of Constitutional Transformation: a View from Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/hrlr/ngad037-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85181842041-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1744-1021-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001133007800001-
dc.identifier.issnl1461-7781-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats