File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Strengths Model Case Management in Hong Kong

TitleRandomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Strengths Model Case Management in Hong Kong
Authors
Keywordsgoal
recovery
SMCM fidelity
strengths model intervention
working alliance
Issue Date24-Aug-2023
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
Research on Social Work Practice, 2023, v. 33, n. 7, p. 728-742 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Strengths-based approaches to case management for people with mental illness have been widely used in Western countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Strengths Model Case Management (SMCM) among mental health clients in Hong Kong. Method: Two hundred and nine service clients were recruited from three Integrated Community Centres. Multiple measures related to recovery progress (e.g., Recovery Assessment Scale) were reported by both the clients and caseworkers before intervention and at 6 and12 months post-recruitment. Results and conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in improvement of most outcomes between the SMCM and control groups, the recovery scores of the SMCM group remained stable over time regardless of age, and also middle-aged participants (i.e., 40–59 years old) in the SMCM group achieved higher recovery scores over time than those in the control group. Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN) 12617001435370.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338443
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.665
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTse, S-
dc.contributor.authorYu, CH-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, WWY-
dc.contributor.authorNg, CSM-
dc.contributor.authorLo, IWK-
dc.contributor.authorFukui, S-
dc.contributor.authorGoscha, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorChan, SHW-
dc.contributor.authorWan, E-
dc.contributor.authorWong, S-
dc.contributor.authorChan, SK-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:28:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:28:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-24-
dc.identifier.citationResearch on Social Work Practice, 2023, v. 33, n. 7, p. 728-742-
dc.identifier.issn1049-7315-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338443-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Strengths-based approaches to case management for people with mental illness have been widely used in Western countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Strengths Model Case Management (SMCM) among mental health clients in Hong Kong. Method: Two hundred and nine service clients were recruited from three Integrated Community Centres. Multiple measures related to recovery progress (e.g., Recovery Assessment Scale) were reported by both the clients and caseworkers before intervention and at 6 and12 months post-recruitment. Results and conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in improvement of most outcomes between the SMCM and control groups, the recovery scores of the SMCM group remained stable over time regardless of age, and also middle-aged participants (i.e., 40–59 years old) in the SMCM group achieved higher recovery scores over time than those in the control group. Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN) 12617001435370.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofResearch on Social Work Practice-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectgoal-
dc.subjectrecovery-
dc.subjectSMCM fidelity-
dc.subjectstrengths model intervention-
dc.subjectworking alliance-
dc.titleRandomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Strengths Model Case Management in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10497315221118550-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85136649796-
dc.identifier.volume33-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage728-
dc.identifier.epage742-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-7581-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000845017900001-
dc.identifier.issnl1049-7315-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats