File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Of Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China

TitleOf Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China
Authors
KeywordsChina
judicial autonomy
judicial reform
legality
professionalism
quota judge
Issue Date24-Sep-2022
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
The China Quarterly, 2022, v. 251, p. 866-887 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article presents the findings of original research on judge quota reform. The reform's agenda was essentially aimed at professionalization: by edging out a given percentage of judges, only the better qualified judges would be re-appointed to create a more professionalized judiciary. A key component of the reform was to reduce the level and the intensity of both political and bureaucratic control over judges in adjudication and to decentralize judicial power to the rank-and-file judges, restoring individualized judging while enhancing judicial accountability. This article critically examines the potential and limits of the judge quota reform in the context of incremental legal reform in a party-state.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338231
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.716
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSun, Y-
dc.contributor.authorFu, H-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:27:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:27:14Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-24-
dc.identifier.citationThe China Quarterly, 2022, v. 251, p. 866-887-
dc.identifier.issn0305-7410-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/338231-
dc.description.abstractThis article presents the findings of original research on judge quota reform. The reform's agenda was essentially aimed at professionalization: by edging out a given percentage of judges, only the better qualified judges would be re-appointed to create a more professionalized judiciary. A key component of the reform was to reduce the level and the intensity of both political and bureaucratic control over judges in adjudication and to decentralize judicial power to the rank-and-file judges, restoring individualized judging while enhancing judicial accountability. This article critically examines the potential and limits of the judge quota reform in the context of incremental legal reform in a party-state.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofThe China Quarterly-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectjudicial autonomy-
dc.subjectjudicial reform-
dc.subjectlegality-
dc.subjectprofessionalism-
dc.subjectquota judge-
dc.titleOf Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0305741022000248-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85127752669-
dc.identifier.volume251-
dc.identifier.spage866-
dc.identifier.epage887-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2648-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000780308100001-
dc.identifier.issnl0305-7410-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats