File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/S0305741022000248
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85127752669
- WOS: WOS:000780308100001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Of Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China
Title | Of Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | China judicial autonomy judicial reform legality professionalism quota judge |
Issue Date | 24-Sep-2022 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Citation | The China Quarterly, 2022, v. 251, p. 866-887 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article presents the findings of original research on judge quota reform. The reform's agenda was essentially aimed at professionalization: by edging out a given percentage of judges, only the better qualified judges would be re-appointed to create a more professionalized judiciary. A key component of the reform was to reduce the level and the intensity of both political and bureaucratic control over judges in adjudication and to decentralize judicial power to the rank-and-file judges, restoring individualized judging while enhancing judicial accountability. This article critically examines the potential and limits of the judge quota reform in the context of incremental legal reform in a party-state. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338231 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.716 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, H | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:27:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:27:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09-24 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The China Quarterly, 2022, v. 251, p. 866-887 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0305-7410 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/338231 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article presents the findings of original research on judge quota reform. The reform's agenda was essentially aimed at professionalization: by edging out a given percentage of judges, only the better qualified judges would be re-appointed to create a more professionalized judiciary. A key component of the reform was to reduce the level and the intensity of both political and bureaucratic control over judges in adjudication and to decentralize judicial power to the rank-and-file judges, restoring individualized judging while enhancing judicial accountability. This article critically examines the potential and limits of the judge quota reform in the context of incremental legal reform in a party-state. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The China Quarterly | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | China | - |
dc.subject | judicial autonomy | - |
dc.subject | judicial reform | - |
dc.subject | legality | - |
dc.subject | professionalism | - |
dc.subject | quota judge | - |
dc.title | Of Judge Quota and Judicial Autonomy: An Enduring Professionalization Project in China | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0305741022000248 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85127752669 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 251 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 866 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 887 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1468-2648 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000780308100001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0305-7410 | - |