File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of magnifying loupes on tooth preparation of complete coverage crown: a quantitative assessment using digital approach

TitleEffect of magnifying loupes on tooth preparation of complete coverage crown: a quantitative assessment using digital approach
Authors
Keywordscrowns
digital evaluation
magnification
preparation
PrepCheck
prosthodontics
Issue Date28-Jan-2023
PublisherWiley
Citation
European Journal of Dental Education, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of magnifying loupes (×2.5) on the quality of tooth preparation for complete coverage crowns; performed by predoctoral students using an objective and quantitative digital method. Materials and Methods: Forty-two predoctoral students were randomly assigned into 2 groups to perform tooth preparation for a complete coverage crown on a mandibular first molar in a manikin, with and without the use of magnifying loupes. All preparations were digitally evaluated by PrepCheck 3.0 (Dentsply Sirona). Parameters including tooth reduction, total occlusal convergence (TOC), undercut, margin quality and surface quality were assessed. Continuous data were analysed using Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. Ordinal data were analysed by McNemer's tests. To further detect the majority pattern (> 50%) in each group (with and without loupes), one-sample t-test or one-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was performed. The level of significance was set at p =.001 after Bonferroni adjustments for multiple testing. Results: No significant differences in the measured outcomes were found between the groups with or without the use of magnifying loupes (p >.002). The majority (>50%) of both groups had no undercuts (99.3% and 99.4% both p <.001) and the preparation type was within tolerance (81.6% and 85.3%, both p <.001) with acceptable margin (86.4% and 86.3%, both p <.001) and acceptable surface quality (99.0% and 99.1%, both p <.001). However, the majority of both groups underprepared occlusally (96.0% and 95.4%, both p <.001) and axially (65.3% and 67%, both p <.001). Only 30.0%–42.1% of the participants achieved the TOC within 0–20°. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the use of magnification loupes does not appear to significantly improve the quality of tooth preparation for complete coverage crown. The TOC was also found to be overprepared and occlusally underprepared.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337925
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.633
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurbay, S-
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, P-
dc.contributor.authorLi, KY-
dc.contributor.authorPow, EHN-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:24:58Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:24:58Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-28-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Dental Education, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn1396-5883-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337925-
dc.description.abstract<p>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of magnifying loupes (×2.5) on the quality of tooth preparation for complete coverage crowns; performed by predoctoral students using an objective and quantitative digital method. Materials and Methods: Forty-two predoctoral students were randomly assigned into 2 groups to perform tooth preparation for a complete coverage crown on a mandibular first molar in a manikin, with and without the use of magnifying loupes. All preparations were digitally evaluated by PrepCheck 3.0 (Dentsply Sirona). Parameters including tooth reduction, total occlusal convergence (TOC), undercut, margin quality and surface quality were assessed. Continuous data were analysed using Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests. Ordinal data were analysed by McNemer's tests. To further detect the majority pattern (&gt; 50%) in each group (with and without loupes), one-sample t-test or one-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was performed. The level of significance was set at p =.001 after Bonferroni adjustments for multiple testing. Results: No significant differences in the measured outcomes were found between the groups with or without the use of magnifying loupes (p &gt;.002). The majority (&gt;50%) of both groups had no undercuts (99.3% and 99.4% both p &lt;.001) and the preparation type was within tolerance (81.6% and 85.3%, both p &lt;.001) with acceptable margin (86.4% and 86.3%, both p &lt;.001) and acceptable surface quality (99.0% and 99.1%, both p &lt;.001). However, the majority of both groups underprepared occlusally (96.0% and 95.4%, both p &lt;.001) and axially (65.3% and 67%, both p &lt;.001). Only 30.0%–42.1% of the participants achieved the TOC within 0–20°. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the use of magnification loupes does not appear to significantly improve the quality of tooth preparation for complete coverage crown. The TOC was also found to be overprepared and occlusally underprepared.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dental Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcrowns-
dc.subjectdigital evaluation-
dc.subjectmagnification-
dc.subjectpreparation-
dc.subjectPrepCheck-
dc.subjectprosthodontics-
dc.titleEffect of magnifying loupes on tooth preparation of complete coverage crown: a quantitative assessment using digital approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eje.12898-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85147578770-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0579-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000929462300001-
dc.identifier.issnl1396-5883-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats