File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Multi-systemic evaluation of biological and emotional responses to the Trier Social Stress Test: A meta-analysis and systematic review

TitleMulti-systemic evaluation of biological and emotional responses to the Trier Social Stress Test: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Authors
KeywordsAcute Stress
Biomarker
Cortisol
Emotion
Meta-analysis
TSST
Issue Date18-Nov-2022
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 2022, v. 68 How to Cite?
Abstract

Humans experience multiple biological and emotional changes under acute stress. Adopting a multi-systemic approach, we summarized 61 studies on healthy people's endocrinological, physiological, immunological and emotional responses to the Trier Social Stress Test. We found salivary cortisol and negative mood states were the most sensitive markers to acute stress and recovery. Biomarkers such as heart rate and salivary alpha-amylase also showed sensitivity to acute stress, but the numbers of studies were small. Other endocrinological (e.g., dehydroepiandrosterone), inflammatory (C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6) and physiological (e.g., skin conductance level) measures received modest support as acute stress markers. Salivary cortisol showed some associations with mood measures (e.g., state anxiety) during acute stress and recovery, and heart rate showed preliminary positive relationship with calmness ratings during response to TSST, but the overall evidence was mixed. While further research is needed, these findings provide updated and comprehensive knowledge on the integrated psychobiological response profiles to TSST.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337699
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 8.333
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.818

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMan, Idy SC-
dc.contributor.authorShao, Robin-
dc.contributor.authorHou, WK-
dc.contributor.authorXin, Li Shirley-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Fiona Yan-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Maggy-
dc.contributor.authorWing, Yun Kwok-
dc.contributor.authorYau, Suk-yu-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tatia MC-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:23:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:23:11Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-18-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 2022, v. 68-
dc.identifier.issn0091-3022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337699-
dc.description.abstract<p>Humans experience multiple biological and emotional changes under acute stress. Adopting a multi-systemic approach, we summarized 61 studies on healthy people's endocrinological, physiological, immunological and emotional responses to the Trier Social Stress Test. We found salivary cortisol and negative mood states were the most sensitive markers to acute stress and recovery. Biomarkers such as heart rate and salivary alpha-amylase also showed sensitivity to acute stress, but the numbers of studies were small. Other endocrinological (e.g., dehydroepiandrosterone), inflammatory (C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6) and physiological (e.g., skin conductance level) measures received modest support as acute stress markers. Salivary cortisol showed some associations with mood measures (e.g., state anxiety) during acute stress and recovery, and heart rate showed preliminary positive relationship with calmness ratings during response to TSST, but the overall evidence was mixed. While further research is needed, these findings provide updated and comprehensive knowledge on the integrated psychobiological response profiles to TSST.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Neuroendocrinology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAcute Stress-
dc.subjectBiomarker-
dc.subjectCortisol-
dc.subjectEmotion-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectTSST-
dc.titleMulti-systemic evaluation of biological and emotional responses to the Trier Social Stress Test: A meta-analysis and systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101050-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85144056671-
dc.identifier.volume68-
dc.identifier.issnl0091-3022-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats