File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparing passengers’ satisfaction with fixed-route and demand-responsive transport services: Empirical evidence from public light bus services in Hong Kong

TitleComparing passengers’ satisfaction with fixed-route and demand-responsive transport services: Empirical evidence from public light bus services in Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsDemand-responsive transport service
Fixed-route transport service
Importance-performance analysis
Ordered logit model
Service quality
Issue Date1-Jul-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Travel Behaviour and Society, 2023, v. 32 How to Cite?
Abstract

Conventional public transport services are usually highly regulated with fixed-route and fixed-schedule, which are considered less flexible and efficient to serve low-density and dispersed settled areas. Demand-responsive transport is possibly a more economically and operationally viable solution, which offers dynamically allocated routes and schedules and serve the widespread passenger demand. There have been numerous simulation studies comparing the effectiveness of these two types of transport services in different settings, but which type is more favorable to passengers and what service aspects play the key role in shaping the overall satisfaction with the service quality from the passengers’ point of view are largely unknown. Using fixed-route and demand-responsive public light buses in Hong Kong as a case study, this research conducted an on-street questionnaire survey with 547 samples regarding the passengers’ perception of the performance of ten service aspects and the overall performance. An ordered logit model was accordingly developed to identify the relative importance and contribution of these service aspects to the overall service quality. An importance-performance analysis was further carried out to visualize the ratings of importance and performance of the service aspects, and to prioritize the improvement areas. The findings reveal that the passengers were less satisfied with the demand-responsive public light bus services in general. Among all the service aspects, we find that the in-vehicle environment, waiting time, driver’s attitude, and safety hold a higher improvement priority. Policy implications for improving and regulating both fixed-route and demand-responsive public light bus services are suggested.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337472
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.570
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, RCP-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Linchuan-
dc.contributor.authorSzeto, WY-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:21:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:21:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationTravel Behaviour and Society, 2023, v. 32-
dc.identifier.issn2214-367X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/337472-
dc.description.abstract<p>Conventional <a href="https://www-sciencedirect-com.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/topics/social-sciences/public-transport" title="Learn more about public transport from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">public transport</a> services are usually highly regulated with fixed-route and fixed-schedule, which are considered less flexible and efficient to serve low-density and dispersed settled areas. Demand-responsive transport is possibly a more economically and operationally viable solution, which offers dynamically allocated routes and schedules and serve the widespread passenger demand. There have been numerous simulation studies comparing the effectiveness of these two types of transport services in different settings, but which type is more favorable to passengers and what service aspects play the key role in shaping the overall satisfaction with the service quality from the passengers’ point of view are largely unknown. Using fixed-route and demand-responsive public light buses in Hong Kong as a case study, this research conducted an on-street questionnaire survey with 547 samples regarding the passengers’ perception of the performance of ten service aspects and the overall performance. An ordered logit model was accordingly developed to identify the relative importance and contribution of these service aspects to the overall service quality. An importance-performance analysis was further carried out to visualize the ratings of importance and performance of the service aspects, and to prioritize the improvement areas. The findings reveal that the passengers were less satisfied with the demand-responsive public light bus services in general. Among all the service aspects, we find that the in-vehicle environment, waiting time, driver’s attitude, and safety hold a higher improvement priority. Policy implications for improving and regulating both fixed-route and demand-responsive public light bus services are suggested.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofTravel Behaviour and Society-
dc.subjectDemand-responsive transport service-
dc.subjectFixed-route transport service-
dc.subjectImportance-performance analysis-
dc.subjectOrdered logit model-
dc.subjectService quality-
dc.titleComparing passengers’ satisfaction with fixed-route and demand-responsive transport services: Empirical evidence from public light bus services in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100583-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85151009505-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.eissn2214-367X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000972673200001-
dc.identifier.issnl2214-367X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats