File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00784-023-05103-1
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85161940340
- PMID: 37316642
- WOS: WOS:001007650900001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The contralateral-based submental artery island flap: feasibility and oncological safety in oral cancer-related defect reconstruction.
Title | The contralateral-based submental artery island flap: feasibility and oncological safety in oral cancer-related defect reconstruction. |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Contralateral submental artery island flap Oncological safety Oral squamous cell carcinoma Reconstruction |
Issue Date | 30-Aug-2023 |
Publisher | Springer |
Citation | Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, v. 27, n. 8, p. 4747-4755 How to Cite? |
Abstract | OBJECTIVES\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION\nOncologic risk is a serious concern of submental artery island flaps. Here, we introduce the contralateral-based submental artery island flap (C-SAIF) and demonstrate its feasibility and long-term oncological safety in reconstructing oral cancer-related defects.\nAn anatomical study was performed concentrating on the pedicle length in seven cadavers. Then, a retrospective study was carried out on C-SAIF patients operated on by a single team. The standard surgical technique of C-SAIF was conducted. Outcomes including operative time, length of hospital stay, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and scores of the Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) questionnaire were compared with a similar cohort reconstructed with anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTF). In addition, oncological outcomes were evaluated by the 5-year cumulative survival rate between C-SAIF and ALTF patients.\nThe pedicle length of C-SAIF was sufficient for the flap to be extended to the contralateral oral cavity. Fifty-two patients were included in the retrospective study, and nineteen of them underwent reconstruction with C-SAIF. The operative time of C-SAIF was shorter (p = 0.003), and the intraoperative blood loss was less (p = 0.004) than that of ALTF. There was no difference in MSGS scores. The results of survival analysis revealed comparable survival curves for the two groups in terms of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival.\nC-SAIF is a feasible and reliable flap for reconstructing oral cancer-related defects. Moreover, it is an effective island flap to preserve the perforator and pedicle without compromising oncological safety. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/337343 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.942 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ma, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhai, X | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ouyang, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Su, YX | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, WF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liao, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, S | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T10:20:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T10:20:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-08-30 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, v. 27, n. 8, p. 4747-4755 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-6981 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/337343 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION\nOncologic risk is a serious concern of submental artery island flaps. Here, we introduce the contralateral-based submental artery island flap (C-SAIF) and demonstrate its feasibility and long-term oncological safety in reconstructing oral cancer-related defects.\nAn anatomical study was performed concentrating on the pedicle length in seven cadavers. Then, a retrospective study was carried out on C-SAIF patients operated on by a single team. The standard surgical technique of C-SAIF was conducted. Outcomes including operative time, length of hospital stay, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and scores of the Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society (MSGS) questionnaire were compared with a similar cohort reconstructed with anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTF). In addition, oncological outcomes were evaluated by the 5-year cumulative survival rate between C-SAIF and ALTF patients.\nThe pedicle length of C-SAIF was sufficient for the flap to be extended to the contralateral oral cavity. Fifty-two patients were included in the retrospective study, and nineteen of them underwent reconstruction with C-SAIF. The operative time of C-SAIF was shorter (p = 0.003), and the intraoperative blood loss was less (p = 0.004) than that of ALTF. There was no difference in MSGS scores. The results of survival analysis revealed comparable survival curves for the two groups in terms of overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival.\nC-SAIF is a feasible and reliable flap for reconstructing oral cancer-related defects. Moreover, it is an effective island flap to preserve the perforator and pedicle without compromising oncological safety. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Investigations | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Contralateral submental artery island flap | - |
dc.subject | Oncological safety | - |
dc.subject | Oral squamous cell carcinoma | - |
dc.subject | Reconstruction | - |
dc.title | The contralateral-based submental artery island flap: feasibility and oncological safety in oral cancer-related defect reconstruction. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00784-023-05103-1 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 37316642 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85161940340 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 4747 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 4755 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1436-3771 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001007650900001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1432-6981 | - |