File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: China's response to nuclear safety pre- and post-Fukushima: An interdisciplinary analysis

TitleChina's response to nuclear safety pre- and post-Fukushima: An interdisciplinary analysis
Authors
KeywordsChina
Comprehensive assessment
Discourse analysis
Nuclear safety
Post-fukushima
Pre-fukushima
Issue Date2022
Citation
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, v. 157, article no. 112002 How to Cite?
AbstractThe Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has rekindled the world's attention to nuclear safety following the devastating nuclear accidents that occurred in the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. As China continues to expand in nuclear power development, how it views and responds to nuclear safety carries significant implications on its nuclear safety and security in the future. This paper examines the Chinese authorities' response to nuclear safety pre- and post-Fukushima, based on (1) a longitudinal big-data discourse analysis of the Chinese newspaper articles published during the period 2008–2017, and (2) an in-depth comprehensive review of nuclear safety performance and safety governance based on credential and publicly available documents and websites, both locally and internationally. Our assessment reveals that (i) China's concerns over nuclear safety and accident surged immediately following the Fukushima crisis. Increasing attention towards nuclear emergency response has been observed since 2014, (ii) China has displayed strengths in reactor design and safety operation, and (iii) its safety governance has been constrained by institutional fragmentation, inadequate transparency, inadequate safety professionals, lack of a strong safety culture, amid its ongoing plans to increase nuclear capacity three-fold by 2050. To improve nuclear safety, China may further strengthen its safety standards, safety management and monitoring, improve institutional arrangements, increase the ratio of safety professionals, intensify its safety culture and transparency, develop process-based safety regulations, and champion international collaboration to keep itself abreast of the latest international best practices.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336838
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 16.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.596
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, Jacqueline C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Lawrence Y.L.-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Yang-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shanshan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-29T06:56:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-29T06:56:53Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, v. 157, article no. 112002-
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336838-
dc.description.abstractThe Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster has rekindled the world's attention to nuclear safety following the devastating nuclear accidents that occurred in the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. As China continues to expand in nuclear power development, how it views and responds to nuclear safety carries significant implications on its nuclear safety and security in the future. This paper examines the Chinese authorities' response to nuclear safety pre- and post-Fukushima, based on (1) a longitudinal big-data discourse analysis of the Chinese newspaper articles published during the period 2008–2017, and (2) an in-depth comprehensive review of nuclear safety performance and safety governance based on credential and publicly available documents and websites, both locally and internationally. Our assessment reveals that (i) China's concerns over nuclear safety and accident surged immediately following the Fukushima crisis. Increasing attention towards nuclear emergency response has been observed since 2014, (ii) China has displayed strengths in reactor design and safety operation, and (iii) its safety governance has been constrained by institutional fragmentation, inadequate transparency, inadequate safety professionals, lack of a strong safety culture, amid its ongoing plans to increase nuclear capacity three-fold by 2050. To improve nuclear safety, China may further strengthen its safety standards, safety management and monitoring, improve institutional arrangements, increase the ratio of safety professionals, intensify its safety culture and transparency, develop process-based safety regulations, and champion international collaboration to keep itself abreast of the latest international best practices.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectComprehensive assessment-
dc.subjectDiscourse analysis-
dc.subjectNuclear safety-
dc.subjectPost-fukushima-
dc.subjectPre-fukushima-
dc.titleChina's response to nuclear safety pre- and post-Fukushima: An interdisciplinary analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2021.112002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85121979300-
dc.identifier.volume157-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 112002-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 112002-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0690-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000778843700001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats