File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Synbiotic-fluoride synergism on enamel remineralization, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity

TitleSynbiotic-fluoride synergism on enamel remineralization, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity
Authors
KeywordsArginine
Fluoride
Remineralization
Synbiotic
Toxicity
Issue Date2023
Citation
Journal of Dentistry, 2023, v. 128, article no. 104356 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective(s): The objectives of the present study were to examine the – a) enamel remineralization potential of synbiotic-fluoride (SF) therapy using a multi-species bacterial pH-cycling model; and b) cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of SF therapy extracts. Materials and methods: The SF therapy group comprised of 2% arginine (Arg), 0.2% NaF, and a probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LRG). The intervention groups studied were: 1) No treatment; 2) 2% Arg; 3) 0.2% NaF; 4) LRG; 5) 2% Arg+0.2% NaF; 6) 2% Arg+LRG; 7) 0.2% NaF+LRG; and 8) 2% Arg+0.2% NaF+LRG (SF therapy). The enamel remineralization potential of SF therapy was investigated under cariogenic biofilm challenge; while the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of SF therapy extracts were examined on HGF-1 and Chinese hamster fibroblast V79, respectively. To determine the remineralization effect, the specimens were subjected to mineral density (MD) assessment using micro-CT, Ca/P molar ratio with SEM-EDX, and enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) estimates. The HGF-1 proliferation assessment was quantified using MTT/CCK-8 assays with qualitative analysis by nuclei staining Hoechst-based fluorescence imaging. The genotoxicity was determined by micronuclei formation test. Results: Mineral gain and %remineralization derived from MD assessment for the SF therapy were significantly higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The %ΔCa/P for the SF and 2% Arg+0.2% NaF were significantly higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The SF and 2% Arg+0.2% NaF groups had the highest EFU compared to the other groups (p<0.05). No significant difference in the %viable HGF-1 cells were observed between the treatment interventions and no treatment group (p>0.05). Compared to the EMS-positive control, the micronuclei formation for all the intervention groups was significantly lower (p<0.05), with no significant difference among the treatment groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The SF therapy enhanced enamel remineralization with no biocompatibility concerns. Clinical significance: With the enhanced enamel remineralization potential discerned in the present study, the SF therapy can be used as a promising caries-preventive agent targeted for high caries-risk individuals.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336415
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBIJLE, Mohammed Nadeem-
dc.contributor.authorABDALLA, Mohamed Mahmoud-
dc.contributor.authorCHU, Chun Hung-
dc.contributor.authorYIU, Cynthia Kar Yung-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T08:26:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T08:26:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, 2023, v. 128, article no. 104356-
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336415-
dc.description.abstractObjective(s): The objectives of the present study were to examine the – a) enamel remineralization potential of synbiotic-fluoride (SF) therapy using a multi-species bacterial pH-cycling model; and b) cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of SF therapy extracts. Materials and methods: The SF therapy group comprised of 2% arginine (Arg), 0.2% NaF, and a probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LRG). The intervention groups studied were: 1) No treatment; 2) 2% Arg; 3) 0.2% NaF; 4) LRG; 5) 2% Arg+0.2% NaF; 6) 2% Arg+LRG; 7) 0.2% NaF+LRG; and 8) 2% Arg+0.2% NaF+LRG (SF therapy). The enamel remineralization potential of SF therapy was investigated under cariogenic biofilm challenge; while the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of SF therapy extracts were examined on HGF-1 and Chinese hamster fibroblast V79, respectively. To determine the remineralization effect, the specimens were subjected to mineral density (MD) assessment using micro-CT, Ca/P molar ratio with SEM-EDX, and enamel fluoride uptake (EFU) estimates. The HGF-1 proliferation assessment was quantified using MTT/CCK-8 assays with qualitative analysis by nuclei staining Hoechst-based fluorescence imaging. The genotoxicity was determined by micronuclei formation test. Results: Mineral gain and %remineralization derived from MD assessment for the SF therapy were significantly higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The %ΔCa/P for the SF and 2% Arg+0.2% NaF were significantly higher than the other groups (p<0.05). The SF and 2% Arg+0.2% NaF groups had the highest EFU compared to the other groups (p<0.05). No significant difference in the %viable HGF-1 cells were observed between the treatment interventions and no treatment group (p>0.05). Compared to the EMS-positive control, the micronuclei formation for all the intervention groups was significantly lower (p<0.05), with no significant difference among the treatment groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The SF therapy enhanced enamel remineralization with no biocompatibility concerns. Clinical significance: With the enhanced enamel remineralization potential discerned in the present study, the SF therapy can be used as a promising caries-preventive agent targeted for high caries-risk individuals.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry-
dc.subjectArginine-
dc.subjectFluoride-
dc.subjectRemineralization-
dc.subjectSynbiotic-
dc.subjectToxicity-
dc.titleSynbiotic-fluoride synergism on enamel remineralization, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104356-
dc.identifier.pmid36370897-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85141942609-
dc.identifier.volume128-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104356-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104356-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000891945700005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats