File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is greenery green? An analytical comparison between the planned, visual, and perceived green

TitleIs greenery green? An analytical comparison between the planned, visual, and perceived green
Authors
Keywordsgreen perception
street view image
subjective measurement
urban ecology
Urban green space
Issue Date2023
Citation
International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2023, v. 21, n. 3, p. 498-515 How to Cite?
AbstractThis research established a comprehensive evaluation system for urban ecological assessment. Through research in the fields of urban planning, urban design, and cognitive psychology, this paper defines three ecological evaluation indexes correspondingly. They measure the vegetation coverage of land (planning green), the visibility of vegetation from the pedestrian’s viewpoint (visual green), and the psychological perception of greenery by human (perceived green). This study uses computerized parametric analysis, computerized deep learning, data visualization, and statistical methods to achieve an accurate description of the three evaluation indicators. This study assumes that the three green values may behave consistently or inconsistently at each point. Therefore, this study, on the one hand, tries to analyze the potential factors affecting each green indicator. On the other hand, by analysing the consistency or discrepancy of the three green values, this research revealed the potential link between urban spatial type and integrated ecological properties. Four areas of Brisbane dominated by different functions were selected for this study (Red Hill and Bardon for residential areas, Brisbane City for downtown CBD, and Woolloongabba for industrial areas). The results of the study demonstrate the credibility and applicability of the three green indicators in different areas, examine the various factors affecting ecology, and provide new design strategies and ideas for urban designers.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336393
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.470
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Qing-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Chu Fan-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hai Miao-
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Wai Shan-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Wen Jing-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Dan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T08:26:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T08:26:28Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Architectural Computing, 2023, v. 21, n. 3, p. 498-515-
dc.identifier.issn1478-0771-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336393-
dc.description.abstractThis research established a comprehensive evaluation system for urban ecological assessment. Through research in the fields of urban planning, urban design, and cognitive psychology, this paper defines three ecological evaluation indexes correspondingly. They measure the vegetation coverage of land (planning green), the visibility of vegetation from the pedestrian’s viewpoint (visual green), and the psychological perception of greenery by human (perceived green). This study uses computerized parametric analysis, computerized deep learning, data visualization, and statistical methods to achieve an accurate description of the three evaluation indicators. This study assumes that the three green values may behave consistently or inconsistently at each point. Therefore, this study, on the one hand, tries to analyze the potential factors affecting each green indicator. On the other hand, by analysing the consistency or discrepancy of the three green values, this research revealed the potential link between urban spatial type and integrated ecological properties. Four areas of Brisbane dominated by different functions were selected for this study (Red Hill and Bardon for residential areas, Brisbane City for downtown CBD, and Woolloongabba for industrial areas). The results of the study demonstrate the credibility and applicability of the three green indicators in different areas, examine the various factors affecting ecology, and provide new design strategies and ideas for urban designers.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Architectural Computing-
dc.subjectgreen perception-
dc.subjectstreet view image-
dc.subjectsubjective measurement-
dc.subjecturban ecology-
dc.subjectUrban green space-
dc.titleIs greenery green? An analytical comparison between the planned, visual, and perceived green-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/14780771231178887-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85169619933-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage498-
dc.identifier.epage515-
dc.identifier.eissn2048-3988-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001185466800008-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats