File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A preface paradox for intention

TitleA preface paradox for intention
Authors
Issue Date2016
Citation
Philosophers Imprint, 2016, v. 16, n. 14, p. 1-20 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this paper I argue that there is a preface paradox for intention. The preface paradox for intention shows that intentions do not obey an agglomeration norm, requiring one to intend conjunctions of whatever else one intends. But what norms do intentions obey? I will argue that intentions come in degrees. These partial intentions are governed by the norms of the probability calculus. First, I will give a dispositional theory of partial intention, on which degrees of intention are the degrees to which one possesses the dispositions characteristic of full intention. I will use this dispositional theory to defend probabilism about intention. Next, I will offer a more general argument for probabilism about intention. To do so, I will generalize recent decision theoretic arguments for probabilism from the case of belief to the case of intention.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336163

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Simon-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T08:24:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T08:24:04Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophers Imprint, 2016, v. 16, n. 14, p. 1-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336163-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I argue that there is a preface paradox for intention. The preface paradox for intention shows that intentions do not obey an agglomeration norm, requiring one to intend conjunctions of whatever else one intends. But what norms do intentions obey? I will argue that intentions come in degrees. These partial intentions are governed by the norms of the probability calculus. First, I will give a dispositional theory of partial intention, on which degrees of intention are the degrees to which one possesses the dispositions characteristic of full intention. I will use this dispositional theory to defend probabilism about intention. Next, I will offer a more general argument for probabilism about intention. To do so, I will generalize recent decision theoretic arguments for probabilism from the case of belief to the case of intention.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophers Imprint-
dc.titleA preface paradox for intention-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84983001877-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue14-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage20-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-628X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats