File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Contextology

TitleContextology
Authors
KeywordsAssertion
Common ground
Context
Pragmatics
Issue Date2022
Citation
Philosophical Studies, 2022, v. 179, n. 11, p. 3187-3209 How to Cite?
AbstractContextology is the science of the dynamics of the conversational context. Contextology formulates laws governing how the shared information states of interlocutors evolve in response to assertion. More precisely, the contextologist attempts to construct a function which, when provided with just a conversation’s pre-update context and the content of an assertion, delivers that conversation’s post-update context. Most contextologists have assumed that the function governing the evolution of the context is simple: the post-update context is just the pre-update context intersected with the content of the assertion. We argue that this assumption is wrong: not only is it false, it is also incoherent given standard contextological assumptions. Moreover, it is impossible in principle to revise it to correctly describe the dynamics of context. We conclude that there can be no science of Contextology. The laws governing the evolution of the context in response to assertion must make essential reference to the private information states of interlocutors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336049
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.203
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorKirk-Giannini, Cameron Domenico-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T08:22:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T08:22:21Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical Studies, 2022, v. 179, n. 11, p. 3187-3209-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336049-
dc.description.abstractContextology is the science of the dynamics of the conversational context. Contextology formulates laws governing how the shared information states of interlocutors evolve in response to assertion. More precisely, the contextologist attempts to construct a function which, when provided with just a conversation’s pre-update context and the content of an assertion, delivers that conversation’s post-update context. Most contextologists have assumed that the function governing the evolution of the context is simple: the post-update context is just the pre-update context intersected with the content of the assertion. We argue that this assumption is wrong: not only is it false, it is also incoherent given standard contextological assumptions. Moreover, it is impossible in principle to revise it to correctly describe the dynamics of context. We conclude that there can be no science of Contextology. The laws governing the evolution of the context in response to assertion must make essential reference to the private information states of interlocutors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophical Studies-
dc.subjectAssertion-
dc.subjectCommon ground-
dc.subjectContext-
dc.subjectPragmatics-
dc.titleContextology-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11098-022-01820-7-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85128846297-
dc.identifier.volume179-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage3187-
dc.identifier.epage3209-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0883-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000794832300001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats