File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Dyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient–caregiver interventions and effects

TitleDyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient–caregiver interventions and effects
Authors
KeywordsCommunication
End of life care
Issue Date19-Oct-2023
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
Citation
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction Family caregiver’s involvement in advance care planning (ACP) is essential to provide high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care and to ease the surrogate decision-making burden. However, no systematic review has focused on existing ACP interventions involving patients and their families.

Aim To systematically summarise current ACP interventions involving patients and their families.

Methods Five English and two Chinese databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The eligible studies were experimental studies describing original data. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools assessed the methodological quality. Narrative synthesis was conducted for data analysis.

Results In total, twenty-eight articles were included. Fifteen studies were randomised controlled trials, and the rest 13 studies were quasi-experimental studies. The data synthesis identified: (1) Key intervention components: strategies to promote ACP, ACP discussion and follow-up, as well as the role of family caregivers; (2) Effects on intended outcomes: interventions have shown benefit on completion of ACP actions, while inconsistent findings were found on the process outcomes and quality of EOL care. In addition, a logic model for patient–caregiver dyadic ACP was created, and the underlying mechanisms of action included well-preparation, open discussion and adequate support for plan/action.

Conclusions This review provides comprehensive evidence about patient–caregiver dyadic ACP, a promising intervention to better prepare for EOL communication and decision-making. A logic model has been mapped to give a preliminary indication for future implementation. More empirical studies are needed to improve this model and culturally adapt it in a real-world setting.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336016
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.631
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiaohang-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tongyao-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Denise Shuk Ting-
dc.contributor.authorChau, Pui Hing-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Mu-Hsing-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Yuanxia-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chia-Chin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T09:49:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-10T09:49:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-19-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn2045-435X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336016-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Introduction</strong> Family caregiver’s involvement in advance care planning (ACP) is essential to provide high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care and to ease the surrogate decision-making burden. However, no systematic review has focused on existing ACP interventions involving patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Aim</strong> To systematically summarise current ACP interventions involving patients and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Five English and two Chinese databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The eligible studies were experimental studies describing original data. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools assessed the methodological quality. Narrative synthesis was conducted for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> In total, twenty-eight articles were included. Fifteen studies were randomised controlled trials, and the rest 13 studies were quasi-experimental studies. The data synthesis identified: (1) Key intervention components: strategies to promote ACP, ACP discussion and follow-up, as well as the role of family caregivers; (2) Effects on intended outcomes: interventions have shown benefit on completion of ACP actions, while inconsistent findings were found on the process outcomes and quality of EOL care. In addition, a logic model for patient–caregiver dyadic ACP was created, and the underlying mechanisms of action included well-preparation, open discussion and adequate support for plan/action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong> This review provides comprehensive evidence about patient–caregiver dyadic ACP, a promising intervention to better prepare for EOL communication and decision-making. A logic model has been mapped to give a preliminary indication for future implementation. More empirical studies are needed to improve this model and culturally adapt it in a real-world setting.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group-
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Supportive & Palliative Care-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCommunication-
dc.subjectEnd of life care-
dc.titleDyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient–caregiver interventions and effects-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/spcare-2023-004430-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85174959219-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-4368-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001090583000001-
dc.identifier.issnl2045-435X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats