File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Factors influencing the psychosocial well‐being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers: A systematic review of dyadic studies

TitleFactors influencing the psychosocial well‐being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers: A systematic review of dyadic studies
Authors
Keywordscaregiver
dementia
dyad
psychosocial well-being
systematic review
Issue Date22-Dec-2023
PublisherWiley
Citation
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

Individuals with dementia and their informal caregivers face significant challenges to their psychosocial well-being, necessitating immediate attention. In spite of the prevalence of this problem, there is limited data regarding the factors that influence the dyadic psychosocial well-being and potential actor–partner influencing mechanisms. Therefore, this review was conducted to synthesise the factors associated with the psychosocial well-being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers. MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies examining the factors influencing dyadic psychosocial well-being outcomes were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis approach was employed for data analysis. A total of 3217 records were yield, out of which 26 studies were included in the analysis. Quality of life emerged as the most extensively investigated dyadic psychosocial well-being outcome, followed by depression. The interrelation between the quality of life for people with dementia and caregivers was observed, where individual members' quality of life was influenced by their own, partner and dyadic factors. However, there is a dearth of research exploring the mechanisms through which one member's factors exert influence on both their own and partner's quality of life within the dyad. This gap also exists for other psychosocial well-being outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which dyadic members influence their own and their partner's psychosocial well-being.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336014
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.572
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shanshan-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yaqi-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Avis Yat Ngar-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Mu‐Hsing-
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Patricia Mary -
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T09:49:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-10T09:49:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-22-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn1445-8330-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336014-
dc.description.abstract<p>Individuals with dementia and their informal caregivers face significant challenges to their psychosocial well-being, necessitating immediate attention. In spite of the prevalence of this problem, there is limited data regarding the factors that influence the dyadic psychosocial well-being and potential actor–partner influencing mechanisms. Therefore, this review was conducted to synthesise the factors associated with the psychosocial well-being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers. MEDLINE via EBSCOhost, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Scopus were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies examining the factors influencing dyadic psychosocial well-being outcomes were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklists. A narrative synthesis approach was employed for data analysis. A total of 3217 records were yield, out of which 26 studies were included in the analysis. Quality of life emerged as the most extensively investigated dyadic psychosocial well-being outcome, followed by depression. The interrelation between the quality of life for people with dementia and caregivers was observed, where individual members' quality of life was influenced by their own, partner and dyadic factors. However, there is a dearth of research exploring the mechanisms through which one member's factors exert influence on both their own and partner's quality of life within the dyad. This gap also exists for other psychosocial well-being outcomes, such as depression and anxiety. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which dyadic members influence their own and their partner's psychosocial well-being.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcaregiver-
dc.subjectdementia-
dc.subjectdyad-
dc.subjectpsychosocial well-being-
dc.subjectsystematic review-
dc.titleFactors influencing the psychosocial well‐being of people with dementia and their informal caregivers: A systematic review of dyadic studies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/inm.13279-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85180244437-
dc.identifier.eissn1447-0349-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001128847700001-
dc.identifier.issnl1445-8330-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats