File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predictors of cognitive functioning trajectories among older Americans: A new investigation covering 20 years of age- and non-age-related cognitive change

TitlePredictors of cognitive functioning trajectories among older Americans: A new investigation covering 20 years of age- and non-age-related cognitive change
Authors
Issue Date2023
Citation
PLoS ONE, 2023, v. 18, n. 2 February, article no. e0281139 How to Cite?
AbstractDespite the extensive study of predictors of cognitive decline in older age, a key uncertainty is how much these predictors explain both the intercept and age- and non-age-related change in cognitive functioning (CF). We examined the contribution of a broad range of life course determinants to CF trajectories. Data came from 7,068 participants in the 1996–2016 Health and Retirement Study. CF was measured as a summary score on a 27-point cognitive battery of items. We estimated multilevel growth curve models to examine the CF trajectories in individuals ages 54–85. We found that the variation in CF level at age 54 was three times as much as the variation in age slope. All the observed individual predictors explained 38% of the variation in CF at age 54. Personal education was the most important predictor (25%), followed by race, household wealth and income, parental education, occupation, and depression. The contributions of activity limitations, chronic diseases, health behaviors (obesity, smoking, vigorous activity), childhood conditions (childhood health, nutrition, financial situation), gender, marital status, and religion were rather small (<5%). Even though the age slope varied with many adulthood factors, they only explained 5.6% of the between-person variation in age slope. Moreover, age explained 23% of within-person variation in CF from age 54 to 85. The rest non-age-related within-person variation could not be explained by the observed time-varying factors. These findings suggest that future research is urgently needed to discover the main determinants of the slope of cognitive decline to slow down the progression of cognitive impairment and dementia.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334899
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Hui-
dc.contributor.authorCagney, Kathleen-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Yoonyoung-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T06:51:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-20T06:51:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2023, v. 18, n. 2 February, article no. e0281139-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334899-
dc.description.abstractDespite the extensive study of predictors of cognitive decline in older age, a key uncertainty is how much these predictors explain both the intercept and age- and non-age-related change in cognitive functioning (CF). We examined the contribution of a broad range of life course determinants to CF trajectories. Data came from 7,068 participants in the 1996–2016 Health and Retirement Study. CF was measured as a summary score on a 27-point cognitive battery of items. We estimated multilevel growth curve models to examine the CF trajectories in individuals ages 54–85. We found that the variation in CF level at age 54 was three times as much as the variation in age slope. All the observed individual predictors explained 38% of the variation in CF at age 54. Personal education was the most important predictor (25%), followed by race, household wealth and income, parental education, occupation, and depression. The contributions of activity limitations, chronic diseases, health behaviors (obesity, smoking, vigorous activity), childhood conditions (childhood health, nutrition, financial situation), gender, marital status, and religion were rather small (<5%). Even though the age slope varied with many adulthood factors, they only explained 5.6% of the between-person variation in age slope. Moreover, age explained 23% of within-person variation in CF from age 54 to 85. The rest non-age-related within-person variation could not be explained by the observed time-varying factors. These findings suggest that future research is urgently needed to discover the main determinants of the slope of cognitive decline to slow down the progression of cognitive impairment and dementia.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE-
dc.titlePredictors of cognitive functioning trajectories among older Americans: A new investigation covering 20 years of age- and non-age-related cognitive change-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0281139-
dc.identifier.pmid36753483-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85147782903-
dc.identifier.volume18-
dc.identifier.issue2 February-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e0281139-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e0281139-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000966264600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats