File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1163/15718085-bja10094
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85128910931
- WOS: WOS:000800671800005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: How to Complicate a Simple Case: The Judgment on the Merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)
Title | How to Complicate a Simple Case: The Judgment on the Merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya) |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | acquiescence continental shelf cut-off effect exclusive economic zone (EEZ) International Court of Justice (ICJ) maritime boundary maritime delimitation |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2022, v. 37, n. 2, p. 350-357 How to Cite? |
Abstract | On 12 October 2021, the International Court of Justice (ICJ or Court) issued its judgment on the merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). The judgment raises questions of significance in respect of two issues upon which this comment elaborates. First, the Court failed to distinguish adequately between the notions of acquiescence and tacit agreement, which were at the basis of Kenya's claim for an agreed boundary running along a parallel of latitude. Second, in drawing the boundary as requested by Somalia, the Court departed from its usual approach concerning the adjustment of the provisional equidistance line established in the first stage of its three-stage delimitation process. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334828 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.283 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lando, Massimo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Joly Hébert, Jessica | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-20T06:51:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-20T06:51:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2022, v. 37, n. 2, p. 350-357 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0927-3522 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334828 | - |
dc.description.abstract | On 12 October 2021, the International Court of Justice (ICJ or Court) issued its judgment on the merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya). The judgment raises questions of significance in respect of two issues upon which this comment elaborates. First, the Court failed to distinguish adequately between the notions of acquiescence and tacit agreement, which were at the basis of Kenya's claim for an agreed boundary running along a parallel of latitude. Second, in drawing the boundary as requested by Somalia, the Court departed from its usual approach concerning the adjustment of the provisional equidistance line established in the first stage of its three-stage delimitation process. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law | - |
dc.subject | acquiescence | - |
dc.subject | continental shelf | - |
dc.subject | cut-off effect | - |
dc.subject | exclusive economic zone (EEZ) | - |
dc.subject | International Court of Justice (ICJ) | - |
dc.subject | maritime boundary | - |
dc.subject | maritime delimitation | - |
dc.title | How to Complicate a Simple Case: The Judgment on the Merits in Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya) | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1163/15718085-bja10094 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85128910931 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 37 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 350 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 357 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1571-8085 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000800671800005 | - |