File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12891-022-05156-5
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85126078311
- PMID: 35260136
- WOS: WOS:000766177400008
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong version of Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee underwent joint replacement surgery: cross-cultural and sub-cultural adaptation, and validation
Title | Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong version of Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee underwent joint replacement surgery: cross-cultural and sub-cultural adaptation, and validation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | FJS-12 Sub-cultural adaptation Total knee arthroplasty Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong Validation |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2022, v. 23, n. 1, article no. 222 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: A patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool which reflects the outcomes of patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are important to be “ceiling effect free” which commonly used PRO tools face. Forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12) has been proved to reduce or even free from ceiling effect. FJS-12 has been translated to different languages. The objectives of this study are to validate FJS-12 in Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong language and look for the goodness of FJS-12 still exist in this language adapted FJS-12 version. Methods: FJS-12 was administered to 75 patients whose majority was obese underwent TKA between September 2019 and March 2020. Patients completed 3 sets of questionnaires (FJS-12, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)) twice, 2 weeks apart. Reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness, test–retest agreement and discriminant validity were evaluated. Results: Reliability of FJS-12 showed moderate to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.870). Test–retest reliability of FJS-12 was good (ICC = 0.769). Bland–Altman plot showed good test–retest agreement. Construct validity in terms of correlations between FJS-12 and OKS, and FJS-12 and NRS were moderate at baseline (Pearson’s coefficient r = 0.598) and good at follow-up (r = 0.879). Smallest detectable change (Responsiveness) was higher than MIC. Floor effect was none observed, and ceiling effect was low. Discriminant validity was found to have no significance. BMI (obesity) did not affect FJS-12 outcomes. Conclusions: The Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong version of FJS-12 showed good test–retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, BMI non-specific, with no floor and low ceiling effects for patients who underwent TKA. Sub-culture differences in individual PRO tools should be considered in certain ethnicities and languages. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334813 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Kevin Ki Wai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chau, Wai Wang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Lawrence Chun Man | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ong, Michael Tim Yun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-20T06:50:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-20T06:50:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2022, v. 23, n. 1, article no. 222 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334813 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: A patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool which reflects the outcomes of patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are important to be “ceiling effect free” which commonly used PRO tools face. Forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12) has been proved to reduce or even free from ceiling effect. FJS-12 has been translated to different languages. The objectives of this study are to validate FJS-12 in Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong language and look for the goodness of FJS-12 still exist in this language adapted FJS-12 version. Methods: FJS-12 was administered to 75 patients whose majority was obese underwent TKA between September 2019 and March 2020. Patients completed 3 sets of questionnaires (FJS-12, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)) twice, 2 weeks apart. Reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness, test–retest agreement and discriminant validity were evaluated. Results: Reliability of FJS-12 showed moderate to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.870). Test–retest reliability of FJS-12 was good (ICC = 0.769). Bland–Altman plot showed good test–retest agreement. Construct validity in terms of correlations between FJS-12 and OKS, and FJS-12 and NRS were moderate at baseline (Pearson’s coefficient r = 0.598) and good at follow-up (r = 0.879). Smallest detectable change (Responsiveness) was higher than MIC. Floor effect was none observed, and ceiling effect was low. Discriminant validity was found to have no significance. BMI (obesity) did not affect FJS-12 outcomes. Conclusions: The Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong version of FJS-12 showed good test–retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, BMI non-specific, with no floor and low ceiling effects for patients who underwent TKA. Sub-culture differences in individual PRO tools should be considered in certain ethnicities and languages. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | - |
dc.subject | FJS-12 | - |
dc.subject | Sub-cultural adaptation | - |
dc.subject | Total knee arthroplasty | - |
dc.subject | Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong | - |
dc.subject | Validation | - |
dc.title | Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong version of Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee underwent joint replacement surgery: cross-cultural and sub-cultural adaptation, and validation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12891-022-05156-5 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35260136 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85126078311 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 222 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 222 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-2474 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000766177400008 | - |