File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/S0020589317000197
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85019264047
- WOS: WOS:000403797200003
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Judicial uncertainties concerning territorial sea delimitation under article 15 of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea
| Title | Judicial uncertainties concerning territorial sea delimitation under article 15 of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | International Court of Justice International Law Commission International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea maritime boundaries maritime delimitation territorial sea UNCLOS |
| Issue Date | 2017 |
| Citation | International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2017, v. 66, n. 3, p. 589-623 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Recent international jurisprudence has shown considerable uncertainty with regard to the delimitation of the territorial sea. While international tribunals endorse a two-stage approach to territorial sea delimitation, there is a lack of judicial consensus on the practical implementation of such an approach. This article argues that the rule-exception relationship between equidistance and special circumstances, as reflected in the drafting history of LOSC Article 15 and in jurisprudence prior to 2007, should inform the delimitation of the territorial sea. Cases since 2007 which have strayed from the earlier jurisprudence on LOSC Article 15, should be seen as a misconstruction of the law applicable to territorial sea delimitation. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334479 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.694 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lando, Massimo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-20T06:48:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-20T06:48:26Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2017, v. 66, n. 3, p. 589-623 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0020-5893 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/334479 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Recent international jurisprudence has shown considerable uncertainty with regard to the delimitation of the territorial sea. While international tribunals endorse a two-stage approach to territorial sea delimitation, there is a lack of judicial consensus on the practical implementation of such an approach. This article argues that the rule-exception relationship between equidistance and special circumstances, as reflected in the drafting history of LOSC Article 15 and in jurisprudence prior to 2007, should inform the delimitation of the territorial sea. Cases since 2007 which have strayed from the earlier jurisprudence on LOSC Article 15, should be seen as a misconstruction of the law applicable to territorial sea delimitation. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International and Comparative Law Quarterly | - |
| dc.subject | International Court of Justice | - |
| dc.subject | International Law Commission | - |
| dc.subject | International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | - |
| dc.subject | maritime boundaries | - |
| dc.subject | maritime delimitation | - |
| dc.subject | territorial sea | - |
| dc.subject | UNCLOS | - |
| dc.title | Judicial uncertainties concerning territorial sea delimitation under article 15 of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0020589317000197 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85019264047 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 66 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 589 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 623 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-6895 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000403797200003 | - |
