File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Four system boundaries for carbon accounts

TitleFour system boundaries for carbon accounts
Authors
KeywordsCarbon emissions
Carbon footprint
China
Consumption-based emission
Embodied emissions
Multi-regional input-output analysis
Issue Date2015
Citation
Ecological Modelling, 2015, v. 318, p. 118-125 How to Cite?
AbstractKnowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input-output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334409
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.512
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.876
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Zhu-
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Kuishuang-
dc.contributor.authorHubacek, Klaus-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Sai-
dc.contributor.authorAnadon, Laura Diaz-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Chao-
dc.contributor.authorGuan, Dabo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T06:47:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-20T06:47:56Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Modelling, 2015, v. 318, p. 118-125-
dc.identifier.issn0304-3800-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334409-
dc.description.abstractKnowing the carbon emission baseline of a region is a precondition for any mitigation effort, but the baselines are highly dependent on the system boundaries for which they are calculated. On the basis of sectoral energy statistics and a nested provincial and global multi-regional input-output model, we calculate and compare four different system boundaries for China's 30 provinces and major cities. The results demonstrate significant differences in the level of emissions for the different system boundaries. Moreover, the associated emissions with each system boundary varies with the regional development level, i.e. richer areas outsource more emissions to other areas, or in other words boundary 4 emissions are higher than boundary 1 emissions for rich areas and vice versa for poor areas. Given these significant differences it is important to be aware of the implications the choice of an accounting system might have on outcomes.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Modelling-
dc.subjectCarbon emissions-
dc.subjectCarbon footprint-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectConsumption-based emission-
dc.subjectEmbodied emissions-
dc.subjectMulti-regional input-output analysis-
dc.titleFour system boundaries for carbon accounts-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.001-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84947046367-
dc.identifier.volume318-
dc.identifier.spage118-
dc.identifier.epage125-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000365369600014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats