File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85127304341
- WOS: WOS:000819869800002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory
Title | The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | evolutionary game model innovation ecosystem Recycled resources industry strategy choice |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, v. 179, article no. 121627 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The recycled resources industry (RRI) is considered one of the pillars for sustainable development. Few studies to date have evaluated the innovation regime in RRI, although it is one of the dilemmas that RRI is facing. Therefore, including “Government,” “Enterprise,” and “University-Research institute” in the evolutionary game model, this paper draws on innovation ecosystem theory and conducts a mechanism analysis to clarify the evolutionary stability of stakeholder strategies in the RRI. The findings highlight six potential Evolutionary Stable Strategies (ESS), with which the ‘ideal state’ can be achieved. Moreover, with and without the subsidy policy, the strategic choices of players are differently interdependent, the divergent factors and the influencing mechanisms to the main stakeholders are identified, and the transmission effect of the influence is found. What's more, a subsidy policy would promote active cooperation between these stakeholders when the subsidy quota is within an appropriate range. This paper unpacks the evolution mechanism black box from the stakeholders’ perspective, which provides a clearer understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of industrial innovation ecosystems. The critical findings also provide evidence for policymakers to facilitate the coevolution of the agents in the innovation ecosystem, thereby improving the overall innovation ability of the RRI. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/333528 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 12.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.118 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hao, Xinyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Guangfu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Xiaoling | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dong, Liang | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-06T05:20:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-06T05:20:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, v. 179, article no. 121627 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0040-1625 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/333528 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The recycled resources industry (RRI) is considered one of the pillars for sustainable development. Few studies to date have evaluated the innovation regime in RRI, although it is one of the dilemmas that RRI is facing. Therefore, including “Government,” “Enterprise,” and “University-Research institute” in the evolutionary game model, this paper draws on innovation ecosystem theory and conducts a mechanism analysis to clarify the evolutionary stability of stakeholder strategies in the RRI. The findings highlight six potential Evolutionary Stable Strategies (ESS), with which the ‘ideal state’ can be achieved. Moreover, with and without the subsidy policy, the strategic choices of players are differently interdependent, the divergent factors and the influencing mechanisms to the main stakeholders are identified, and the transmission effect of the influence is found. What's more, a subsidy policy would promote active cooperation between these stakeholders when the subsidy quota is within an appropriate range. This paper unpacks the evolution mechanism black box from the stakeholders’ perspective, which provides a clearer understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of industrial innovation ecosystems. The critical findings also provide evidence for policymakers to facilitate the coevolution of the agents in the innovation ecosystem, thereby improving the overall innovation ability of the RRI. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Technological Forecasting and Social Change | - |
dc.subject | evolutionary game model | - |
dc.subject | innovation ecosystem | - |
dc.subject | Recycled resources industry | - |
dc.subject | strategy choice | - |
dc.title | The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85127304341 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 179 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 121627 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 121627 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000819869800002 | - |