File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Collective Action in maintaining rural infrastructures: cadre-farmer relationship, institution rules and their interaction terms

TitleCollective Action in maintaining rural infrastructures: cadre-farmer relationship, institution rules and their interaction terms
Authors
Keywordscadre-farmer relationships
farmer willingness
institutional rules
maintenance
Rural infrastructure
Issue Date2020
Citation
Land Use Policy, 2020, v. 99, article no. 105043 How to Cite?
AbstractMaintaining and improving rural infrastructure is one approach to realize rural revitalization in China. The running of rural infrastructure maintenance projects constructed upon village land generally involves two major problems, which are the lack of institutional rules and a weakening relationship between village cadres and farmers. By extending the IAD Framework, this paper studies how institutional rules, cadre-farmer relationships and their interaction term affect farmer willingness to maintain infrastructure. When involving the utilization and governance of public resources such as collective land, both local resource endowment and farmers’ willingness should be fully considered. The results show that institutional rules and good cadre-farmer relationships can both significantly improve farmer willingness, and strengthen the positive effect of institutional rules on farmer willingness. However, the introduction of the interaction term renders institutional rules insignificant, showing that a good cadre-farmer relationship is necessary for ensuring institutional rules take effect. The results are robust after controlling village heterogeneity. Furthermore, we identify two mechanisms underlying successful cadre-farmer relationships. The first is cadres mobilizing farmers to participate, and the second is enabling farmers to have a better understanding and recognition of institutional rules, thus improving their willingness to participate in rural infrastructure maintenance. This paper concludes by discussing how these findings point to new policy prescriptions surrounding the tragedy of the commons and tragedy of the anti-commons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333464
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.847
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCao, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Lingxiao-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:19:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:19:34Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy, 2020, v. 99, article no. 105043-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333464-
dc.description.abstractMaintaining and improving rural infrastructure is one approach to realize rural revitalization in China. The running of rural infrastructure maintenance projects constructed upon village land generally involves two major problems, which are the lack of institutional rules and a weakening relationship between village cadres and farmers. By extending the IAD Framework, this paper studies how institutional rules, cadre-farmer relationships and their interaction term affect farmer willingness to maintain infrastructure. When involving the utilization and governance of public resources such as collective land, both local resource endowment and farmers’ willingness should be fully considered. The results show that institutional rules and good cadre-farmer relationships can both significantly improve farmer willingness, and strengthen the positive effect of institutional rules on farmer willingness. However, the introduction of the interaction term renders institutional rules insignificant, showing that a good cadre-farmer relationship is necessary for ensuring institutional rules take effect. The results are robust after controlling village heterogeneity. Furthermore, we identify two mechanisms underlying successful cadre-farmer relationships. The first is cadres mobilizing farmers to participate, and the second is enabling farmers to have a better understanding and recognition of institutional rules, thus improving their willingness to participate in rural infrastructure maintenance. This paper concludes by discussing how these findings point to new policy prescriptions surrounding the tragedy of the commons and tragedy of the anti-commons.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLand Use Policy-
dc.subjectcadre-farmer relationships-
dc.subjectfarmer willingness-
dc.subjectinstitutional rules-
dc.subjectmaintenance-
dc.subjectRural infrastructure-
dc.titleCollective Action in maintaining rural infrastructures: cadre-farmer relationship, institution rules and their interaction terms-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105043-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85090403085-
dc.identifier.volume99-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 105043-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 105043-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000594489500013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats