File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Land use policy as an instrument of rural resilience – The case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China

TitleLand use policy as an instrument of rural resilience – The case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China
Authors
KeywordsAssessment index
Government regulations
Land market
Rural development
Rural sustainability
Issue Date2018
Citation
Ecological Indicators, 2018, v. 87, p. 47-55 How to Cite?
AbstractResilience has emerged as an attractive conceptual approach for theorizing rural development in terms of highly complex, vulnerable and adaptive systems. In China, land use policies have evidently influenced rural resilience. We conduct a co-citation analysis, especially the visualization of co-citation networks and research clusters, using CiteSpace 4.0.R5. Based on the analysis and literature review, we develop an assessment index system comprising four types of resilience – engineering, ecological, economic and social – to evaluate the changes in rural resilience resulting from a policy to develop a withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads (WMRH). Our findings indicate that rural resilience in Guangzhou, Chongqing and Wuxi, selected as the study areas, increased by 123%, 61% and 88% respectively after the implementation of the policy. The main causes of these variations in changes in rural resilience are attributed to the diverse economic development modes in the different regions, as well as differing degrees of land market development and government regulation. Overall, the implementation of a WMRH, accompanied by a strong market and government regulation, is found to be optimal for enhancing rural resilience. We conclude that improving rural resilience involves appropriate government regulations as well as simply paying attention to the effects of the market on the optimal allocation of resources.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333307
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.633
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xianjin-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Huan-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xin-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:18:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:18:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Indicators, 2018, v. 87, p. 47-55-
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333307-
dc.description.abstractResilience has emerged as an attractive conceptual approach for theorizing rural development in terms of highly complex, vulnerable and adaptive systems. In China, land use policies have evidently influenced rural resilience. We conduct a co-citation analysis, especially the visualization of co-citation networks and research clusters, using CiteSpace 4.0.R5. Based on the analysis and literature review, we develop an assessment index system comprising four types of resilience – engineering, ecological, economic and social – to evaluate the changes in rural resilience resulting from a policy to develop a withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads (WMRH). Our findings indicate that rural resilience in Guangzhou, Chongqing and Wuxi, selected as the study areas, increased by 123%, 61% and 88% respectively after the implementation of the policy. The main causes of these variations in changes in rural resilience are attributed to the diverse economic development modes in the different regions, as well as differing degrees of land market development and government regulation. Overall, the implementation of a WMRH, accompanied by a strong market and government regulation, is found to be optimal for enhancing rural resilience. We conclude that improving rural resilience involves appropriate government regulations as well as simply paying attention to the effects of the market on the optimal allocation of resources.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Indicators-
dc.subjectAssessment index-
dc.subjectGovernment regulations-
dc.subjectLand market-
dc.subjectRural development-
dc.subjectRural sustainability-
dc.titleLand use policy as an instrument of rural resilience – The case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.043-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85038845556-
dc.identifier.volume87-
dc.identifier.spage47-
dc.identifier.epage55-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000430761100006-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats