File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Corporate sustainability for architecture engineering and construction (AEC) organizations: Framework, transition and implication strategies

TitleCorporate sustainability for architecture engineering and construction (AEC) organizations: Framework, transition and implication strategies
Authors
KeywordsArchitecture engineering and construction (AEC) industry
Case study
Regenerative development
Sustainability
Sustainable framework
Issue Date2016
Citation
Ecological Indicators, 2016, v. 61, p. 911-922 How to Cite?
AbstractThis research aims to propose a regenerative sustainability framework for AEC organizations, not only to focus on delivering green certified projects, but to encourage a revitalized approach to systematically drive their sustainability initiative. To achieve this aim, the study conducts an extensive global review of sustainable assessment systems in various industries and organizations, such as corporate sustainable reports, green company competitions, and green-renowned stocks. After learning the best practices from other industries, a sustainable development framework for the AEC organizations is developed. The proposed framework constitutes 110 key indicators covering three-dimensions of sustainability - social, environmental, and economic, respectively - and four-elements of corporate development essentials - projects, operations, governance, and stakeholders. By comparing the proposed framework to existing AEC practices, the study identifies the skewed development of corporate sustainability in the AEC industry where much awareness have been given to project-level environmental matters, but the social dimension, such as social stakeholders and social governance, are seriously lacking and need to be prioritized. A case study of a multi-millions construction company in China was investigated to validate this framework in practice. The case analysis justifies the practical value of the proposed framework, and elaborates the future need of regenerative sustainable initiatives for AEC organizations. The study contributes to the development of corporate sustainability theory in the AEC industry, and also provides industrial practitioners and policy makers with a better understanding of the next generation of corporate sustainable performance and implementation strategies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333148
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.633
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLu, Yujie-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaoling-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:17:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:17:05Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Indicators, 2016, v. 61, p. 911-922-
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/333148-
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to propose a regenerative sustainability framework for AEC organizations, not only to focus on delivering green certified projects, but to encourage a revitalized approach to systematically drive their sustainability initiative. To achieve this aim, the study conducts an extensive global review of sustainable assessment systems in various industries and organizations, such as corporate sustainable reports, green company competitions, and green-renowned stocks. After learning the best practices from other industries, a sustainable development framework for the AEC organizations is developed. The proposed framework constitutes 110 key indicators covering three-dimensions of sustainability - social, environmental, and economic, respectively - and four-elements of corporate development essentials - projects, operations, governance, and stakeholders. By comparing the proposed framework to existing AEC practices, the study identifies the skewed development of corporate sustainability in the AEC industry where much awareness have been given to project-level environmental matters, but the social dimension, such as social stakeholders and social governance, are seriously lacking and need to be prioritized. A case study of a multi-millions construction company in China was investigated to validate this framework in practice. The case analysis justifies the practical value of the proposed framework, and elaborates the future need of regenerative sustainable initiatives for AEC organizations. The study contributes to the development of corporate sustainability theory in the AEC industry, and also provides industrial practitioners and policy makers with a better understanding of the next generation of corporate sustainable performance and implementation strategies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Indicators-
dc.subjectArchitecture engineering and construction (AEC) industry-
dc.subjectCase study-
dc.subjectRegenerative development-
dc.subjectSustainability-
dc.subjectSustainable framework-
dc.titleCorporate sustainability for architecture engineering and construction (AEC) organizations: Framework, transition and implication strategies-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.046-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84949724042-
dc.identifier.volume61-
dc.identifier.spage911-
dc.identifier.epage922-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000367411200074-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats