File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effective conservation of subterranean‐roosting bats

TitleEffective conservation of subterranean‐roosting bats
Authors
Keywordsbiología subterránea
Chiroptera
chiroptera
colocación de compuertas
conservación basada en evidencias
dormidero
ecosystem service
especie paraguas
evidence-based conservation
gating
management practices
prácticas de manejo
roost
servicio ambiental
subterranean biology
umbrella species
伞护种
地下生物
基于证据的保护
封堵
生态系统服务
管理措施
翼手目
蝙蝠栖息地
Issue Date28-Jul-2023
PublisherWiley
Citation
Conservation Biology, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

Bats frequently inhabit caves and other subterranean habitats and play a critical role in subterranean food webs. With escalating threats to subterranean ecosystems, identifying the most effective measures to protect subterranean-roosting bats is critical. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation and management interventions for subterranean-roosting bats. We used network analyses to determine to what extent interventions for bats overlap those used for other subterranean taxa. We conducted our analyses with data extracted from 345 papers recommending a total of 910 conservation interventions. Gating of roost entrances was applied to preserve bat populations in 21 studies, but its effectiveness was unclear. Habitat restoration and disturbance reduction positively affected bat populations and bat behavior, respectively, in =4 studies. Decontamination was assessed in 2 studies and positively affected bat populations, particularly in studies focused on reducing fungal spores associated with white-nose syndrome in North America. Monitoring of bat populations as an effective conservation strategy was unclear and infrequently tested. Only 4% of bat studies simultaneously considered other subterranean organisms. However, effective interventions for bat conservation had similarities with all other organisms. If other subterranean organisms are considered when applying interventions to conserve bats, they might also benefit.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/332209
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.168
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeierhofer, B Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, S Joseph-
dc.contributor.authorPerez‐Jimenez, Janette-
dc.contributor.authorIto, Fernanda-
dc.contributor.authorWebela, W Paul-
dc.contributor.authorWiantoro, Sigit-
dc.contributor.authorBernard, Enrico-
dc.contributor.authorTanalgo, C Krizler-
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Alice-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorLilley, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorMammola, Stefano-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-04T07:20:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-04T07:20:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-28-
dc.identifier.citationConservation Biology, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/332209-
dc.description.abstract<p>Bats frequently inhabit caves and other subterranean habitats and play a critical role in subterranean food webs. With escalating threats to subterranean ecosystems, identifying the most effective measures to protect subterranean-roosting bats is critical. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation and management interventions for subterranean-roosting bats. We used network analyses to determine to what extent interventions for bats overlap those used for other subterranean taxa. We conducted our analyses with data extracted from 345 papers recommending a total of 910 conservation interventions. Gating of roost entrances was applied to preserve bat populations in 21 studies, but its effectiveness was unclear. Habitat restoration and disturbance reduction positively affected bat populations and bat behavior, respectively, in =4 studies. Decontamination was assessed in 2 studies and positively affected bat populations, particularly in studies focused on reducing fungal spores associated with white-nose syndrome in North America. Monitoring of bat populations as an effective conservation strategy was unclear and infrequently tested. Only 4% of bat studies simultaneously considered other subterranean organisms. However, effective interventions for bat conservation had similarities with all other organisms. If other subterranean organisms are considered when applying interventions to conserve bats, they might also benefit.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofConservation Biology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbiología subterránea-
dc.subjectChiroptera-
dc.subjectchiroptera-
dc.subjectcolocación de compuertas-
dc.subjectconservación basada en evidencias-
dc.subjectdormidero-
dc.subjectecosystem service-
dc.subjectespecie paraguas-
dc.subjectevidence-based conservation-
dc.subjectgating-
dc.subjectmanagement practices-
dc.subjectprácticas de manejo-
dc.subjectroost-
dc.subjectservicio ambiental-
dc.subjectsubterranean biology-
dc.subjectumbrella species-
dc.subject伞护种-
dc.subject地下生物-
dc.subject基于证据的保护-
dc.subject封堵-
dc.subject生态系统服务-
dc.subject管理措施-
dc.subject翼手目-
dc.subject蝙蝠栖息地-
dc.titleEffective conservation of subterranean‐roosting bats-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cobi.14157-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85166420069-
dc.identifier.eissn1523-1739-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001038911000001-
dc.identifier.issnl0888-8892-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats