File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3390/plants12122291
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85164005446
- WOS: WOS:001015933700001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Developing Biodiversity Baselines to Develop and Implement Future Conservation Targets
Title | Developing Biodiversity Baselines to Develop and Implement Future Conservation Targets |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | biodiversity framework convention of biodiversity data global targets indicators |
Issue Date | 12-Jun-2023 |
Publisher | MDPI |
Citation | Plants, 2023, v. 12, n. 12 How to Cite? |
Abstract | With the recent launch of the Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework (GBF), and the associated monitoring framework, understanding the framework and data needed to support it is crucial. Unfortunately, whilst the monitoring framework was meant to provide key data to monitor progress towards goals and targets, most indicators are too unclear for detection or marking progress. The most common datasets for this task, such as the IUCN redlist of species, have major spatial inaccuracies, and lack the temporal resolution to track progress, whilst point-based datasets lack data from many regions, in addition to species coverage. Utilising existing data will require the careful use of existing data, such as the use of inventories and projecting richness patterns, or filling data gaps before developing species-level models and assessments. As high-resolution data fall outside the scope of explicit indicators within the monitoring framework, using essential biodiversity variables within GEOBON (which are noted in the prelude of the monitoring framework) as a vehicle for data aggregation provides a mechanism for collating the necessary high-resolution data. Ultimately developing effective targets for conservation will require better species data, for which National Biodiversity Strategic Action Plans (NBSAPs) and novel mechanisms for data mobilisation will be necessary. Furthermore, capitalising on climate targets and climate biodiversity synergies within the GBF provides an additional means for developing meaningful targets, trying to develop urgently needed data to monitor biodiversity trends, prioritising meaningful tasks, and tracking our progress towards biodiversity targets. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/332208 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.795 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Alice C | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-04T07:20:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-04T07:20:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Plants, 2023, v. 12, n. 12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2223-7747 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/332208 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>With the recent launch of the Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework (GBF), and the associated monitoring framework, understanding the framework and data needed to support it is crucial. Unfortunately, whilst the monitoring framework was meant to provide key data to monitor progress towards goals and targets, most indicators are too unclear for detection or marking progress. The most common datasets for this task, such as the IUCN redlist of species, have major spatial inaccuracies, and lack the temporal resolution to track progress, whilst point-based datasets lack data from many regions, in addition to species coverage. Utilising existing data will require the careful use of existing data, such as the use of inventories and projecting richness patterns, or filling data gaps before developing species-level models and assessments. As high-resolution data fall outside the scope of explicit indicators within the monitoring framework, using essential biodiversity variables within GEOBON (which are noted in the prelude of the monitoring framework) as a vehicle for data aggregation provides a mechanism for collating the necessary high-resolution data. Ultimately developing effective targets for conservation will require better species data, for which National Biodiversity Strategic Action Plans (NBSAPs) and novel mechanisms for data mobilisation will be necessary. Furthermore, capitalising on climate targets and climate biodiversity synergies within the GBF provides an additional means for developing meaningful targets, trying to develop urgently needed data to monitor biodiversity trends, prioritising meaningful tasks, and tracking our progress towards biodiversity targets.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Plants | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | biodiversity framework | - |
dc.subject | convention of biodiversity | - |
dc.subject | data | - |
dc.subject | global targets | - |
dc.subject | indicators | - |
dc.title | Developing Biodiversity Baselines to Develop and Implement Future Conservation Targets | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/plants12122291 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85164005446 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2223-7747 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001015933700001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2223-7747 | - |