File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Associations between COVID-19 mental impact and distress, resilience, burnout and well-being in Hong Kong community adults: A structural equation model

TitleAssociations between COVID-19 mental impact and distress, resilience, burnout and well-being in Hong Kong community adults: A structural equation model
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19
Indirect effects
Mediation
Pandemic
Psychological distress
Issue Date6-Jul-2023
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Psychology, Health and Medicine, 2023, v. 28, n. 7, p. 1803-1817 How to Cite?
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic poses substantial risks to individuals’ physical and mental health and prolonged psychological responses to the pandemic could lead to emotional exhaustion. The present study aimed to examine the mediating role of COVID-19 related mental impact and distress in the relationship among resilience, burnout, and well-being. The present study recruited 500 community adults (mean age = 38.8 years, SD = 13.9; 76% females) in Hong Kong via an online survey in autumn 2021. The participants completed the Mental Impact and Distress Scale: COVID-19 (MIDc) and validated measures on resilience, burnout, and well-being. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MIDc. Direct and indirect effects of resilience on burnout and well-being via MIDc were examined via structural equation modeling. Confirmatory factor analysis supported factorial validity for the three factors of MIDc (situational impact, anticipation, and modulation). Resilience showed negative effects on the MIDc (β = −0.69, SE = 0.04, p < 0.01) and burnout (β = 0.23, SE = 0.06, p < 0.01). Burnout was positively associated with MIDc (β = 0.63, SE = 0.06, p < 0.01) and negatively associated with well-being (β = −0.47, SE = 0.07, p < 0.01). Resilience showed a significant and positive indirect effect (αβγ = 0.203, 95% CI = 0.131 to 0.285) on well-being via MIDc and burnout. The results support a potential mediating role for MIDc as psychological responses in the relationship among resilience and burnout and well-being.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331916
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.938
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFong, Ted CT-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Kay-
dc.contributor.authorSit, Hao Fong-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Rainbow TH-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-28T04:59:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-28T04:59:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-06-
dc.identifier.citationPsychology, Health and Medicine, 2023, v. 28, n. 7, p. 1803-1817-
dc.identifier.issn1354-8506-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331916-
dc.description.abstract<p>The COVID-19 pandemic poses substantial risks to individuals’ physical and mental health and prolonged psychological responses to the pandemic could lead to emotional exhaustion. The present study aimed to examine the mediating role of COVID-19 related mental impact and distress in the relationship among resilience, burnout, and well-being. The present study recruited 500 community adults (mean age = 38.8 years, SD = 13.9; 76% females) in Hong Kong via an online survey in autumn 2021. The participants completed the Mental Impact and Distress Scale: COVID-19 (MIDc) and validated measures on resilience, burnout, and well-being. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MIDc. Direct and indirect effects of resilience on burnout and well-being via MIDc were examined via structural equation modeling. Confirmatory factor analysis supported factorial validity for the three factors of MIDc (situational impact, anticipation, and modulation). Resilience showed negative effects on the MIDc (β = −0.69, SE = 0.04, <em>p</em> < 0.01) and burnout (β = 0.23, SE = 0.06, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Burnout was positively associated with MIDc (β = 0.63, SE = 0.06, <em>p</em> < 0.01) and negatively associated with well-being (β = −0.47, SE = 0.07, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Resilience showed a significant and positive indirect effect (αβγ = 0.203, 95% CI = 0.131 to 0.285) on well-being via MIDc and burnout. The results support a potential mediating role for MIDc as psychological responses in the relationship among resilience and burnout and well-being.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofPsychology, Health and Medicine-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectIndirect effects-
dc.subjectMediation-
dc.subjectPandemic-
dc.subjectPsychological distress-
dc.titleAssociations between COVID-19 mental impact and distress, resilience, burnout and well-being in Hong Kong community adults: A structural equation model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13548506.2023.2229235-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85164564017-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1803-
dc.identifier.epage1817-
dc.identifier.eissn1465-3966-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001020813300001-
dc.identifier.issnl1354-8506-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats