File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Rugged terrain, forest coverage, and insurgency in Myanmar

TitleRugged terrain, forest coverage, and insurgency in Myanmar
Authors
KeywordsCivil conflict
forest coverage
Myanmar
rugged terrain
Southeast Asia
Issue Date9-May-2023
PublisherSAGE Publications
Citation
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2023 How to Cite?
Abstract

This paper examines whether non-monotonic patterns exist between forest coverage and conflict processes in Myanmar. Specifically, the paper finds that forest coverage and civil conflict follow an inverted U-shaped relationship: conflict decreases at extremely low and high densities of forest coverage but increases at medium and somewhat high forest densities. Following the logic of the variability of rugged terrain, we argue that this pattern reflects the dual mechanisms of refuge and tactical advantages for rebel groups, who intentionally use such terrain to maximize logistical advantage while minimizing the military advantages enjoyed by better equipped government forces.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331740
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.819
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.363

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChow, Wilfred-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Enze-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:58:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:58:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-09-
dc.identifier.citationConflict Management and Peace Science, 2023-
dc.identifier.issn0738-8942-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331740-
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper examines whether non-monotonic patterns exist between forest coverage and conflict processes in Myanmar. Specifically, the paper finds that forest coverage and civil conflict follow an inverted U-shaped relationship: conflict decreases at extremely low and high densities of forest coverage but increases at medium and somewhat high forest densities. Following the logic of the variability of rugged terrain, we argue that this pattern reflects the dual mechanisms of refuge and tactical advantages for rebel groups, who intentionally use such terrain to maximize logistical advantage while minimizing the military advantages enjoyed by better equipped government forces.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
dc.relation.ispartofConflict Management and Peace Science-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCivil conflict-
dc.subjectforest coverage-
dc.subjectMyanmar-
dc.subjectrugged terrain-
dc.subjectSoutheast Asia-
dc.titleRugged terrain, forest coverage, and insurgency in Myanmar-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/07388942231171334-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85159053437-
dc.identifier.eissn1549-9219-
dc.identifier.issnl0738-8942-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats