File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Isolated Liner Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Mean of 13 Years of Follow-up: Does Fixation Technique Matter?

TitleIsolated Liner Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Mean of 13 Years of Follow-up: Does Fixation Technique Matter?
Authors
Keywordscementation
conventional polyethylene
fixation technique
highly-crosslinked polyethylene
isolated liner exchange
original locking mechanism
Issue Date6-Dec-2022
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Arthroplasty, 2023, v. 38, n. 5, p. 893-898 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background

Isolated liner exchange is an option to address polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The liner can be fixed with either the original locking mechanism or cemented into the acetabular cup. Whether the method used for liner fixation has any bearing on the outcomes in the first and second decade after surgery is still unclear.

Methods

Data for all patients who had undergone isolated liner exchange surgery in our institution between April 1995 and January 2015 were retrieved. Patients were classified according to the type of polyethylene liner (conventional or highly crosslinked polyethylene) and the locking mechanism used (original locking mechanism or cemented). Survivorship and revision rates were compared among different subgroups. A total of 118 isolated liner exchanges were performed and patients had a mean duration of follow-up of 13 years (range, 5 to 25).

Results

Overall estimated mean survivorship was 17 years. Use of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) had a lower re-revision rate compared to conventional liners (10.5 versus 46.9%) (P < .001). The re-revision rate of exchanges using HXLPE was not affected by the type of fixation (original locking mechanism 11.1 versus cement 10.0%, P = .868). Conversely, using the original locking mechanism with a conventional liner had a higher re-revision rate compared to cemented conventional liners (58.3 versus 12.5%) (P = .024).

Conclusion

HXLPE liners should be used in insert exchange surgery whenever possible. Re-revision rate of exchanges using HXLPE was not affected by the fixation technique used. Cementing an insert into an acetabular component is associated with good survivorship at a mean of 13 years follow-up.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330961
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.849
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Wai Kiu Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Henry-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Man Hong-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ping Keung-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Kwong Yuen-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:51:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:51:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Arthroplasty, 2023, v. 38, n. 5, p. 893-898-
dc.identifier.issn0883-5403-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330961-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Isolated liner exchange is an option to address polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The liner can be fixed with either the original locking mechanism or cemented into the acetabular cup. Whether the method used for liner fixation has any bearing on the outcomes in the first and second decade after surgery is still unclear.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data for all patients who had undergone isolated liner exchange surgery in our institution between April 1995 and January 2015 were retrieved. Patients were classified according to the type of polyethylene liner (conventional or highly crosslinked polyethylene) and the locking mechanism used (original locking mechanism or cemented). Survivorship and revision rates were compared among different subgroups. A total of 118 isolated liner exchanges were performed and patients had a mean duration of follow-up of 13 years (range, 5 to 25).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall estimated mean survivorship was 17 years. Use of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) had a lower re-revision rate compared to conventional liners (10.5 versus 46.9%) (<em>P</em> < .001). The re-revision rate of exchanges using HXLPE was not affected by the type of fixation (original locking mechanism 11.1 versus cement 10.0%, <em>P</em> = .868). Conversely, using the original locking mechanism with a conventional liner had a higher re-revision rate compared to cemented conventional liners (58.3 versus 12.5%) (<em>P</em> = .024).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HXLPE liners should be used in insert exchange surgery whenever possible. Re-revision rate of exchanges using HXLPE was not affected by the fixation technique used. Cementing an insert into an acetabular component is associated with good survivorship at a mean of 13 years follow-up.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Arthroplasty-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcementation-
dc.subjectconventional polyethylene-
dc.subjectfixation technique-
dc.subjecthighly-crosslinked polyethylene-
dc.subjectisolated liner exchange-
dc.subjectoriginal locking mechanism-
dc.titleIsolated Liner Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Mean of 13 Years of Follow-up: Does Fixation Technique Matter?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.012-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85150756014-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage893-
dc.identifier.epage898-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000985883700001-
dc.identifier.issnl0883-5403-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats