File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3390/ijerph191912976
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85139919188
- PMID: 36232276
- WOS: WOS:000866809400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Types of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers
Title | Types of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | caregivers center-based services financial subsidy individuals with disabilities self-efficacy for continuous community living |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, n. 19, article no. 12976 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study explored the impacts of five types of community support services (i.e., center-based care, home-based care, respite care, caregiver assistance, and financial subsidies) on self-efficacy for continuous community living among individuals with disabilities and caregivers. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: The sample consisted of a group of individuals with disabilities (n = 948) and a group of caregivers (n = 522). A mixed ANOVA was applied to explore the differences in the perceived importance of improvements to community support services between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the perceived importance of improvements to types of community support services for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Results: Caregivers perceived higher levels of importance for improvements to community support services than individuals with disabilities. Both groups reported that financial subsidies were the most important area for improvement. The greater importance of improvements to financial subsidies reported by caregivers predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. The greater importance of improvements to center-based services reported by individuals with disabilities predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Conclusions: The findings suggested that financial subsidies for caregivers and center-based services for individuals with disabilities could improve self-efficacy for continuous community living. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/330864 |
ISSN | 2019 Impact Factor: 2.849 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.808 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Wai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cao, Yuan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Erin Yiqing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Wai Ming | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, Hector Wing Hong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-05T12:15:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-05T12:15:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, n. 19, article no. 12976 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1661-7827 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/330864 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study explored the impacts of five types of community support services (i.e., center-based care, home-based care, respite care, caregiver assistance, and financial subsidies) on self-efficacy for continuous community living among individuals with disabilities and caregivers. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: The sample consisted of a group of individuals with disabilities (n = 948) and a group of caregivers (n = 522). A mixed ANOVA was applied to explore the differences in the perceived importance of improvements to community support services between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the perceived importance of improvements to types of community support services for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Results: Caregivers perceived higher levels of importance for improvements to community support services than individuals with disabilities. Both groups reported that financial subsidies were the most important area for improvement. The greater importance of improvements to financial subsidies reported by caregivers predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. The greater importance of improvements to center-based services reported by individuals with disabilities predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Conclusions: The findings suggested that financial subsidies for caregivers and center-based services for individuals with disabilities could improve self-efficacy for continuous community living. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | - |
dc.subject | caregivers | - |
dc.subject | center-based services | - |
dc.subject | financial subsidy | - |
dc.subject | individuals with disabilities | - |
dc.subject | self-efficacy for continuous community living | - |
dc.title | Types of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijerph191912976 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36232276 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85139919188 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 19 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 12976 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 12976 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1660-4601 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000866809400001 | - |