File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Types of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers

TitleTypes of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers
Authors
Keywordscaregivers
center-based services
financial subsidy
individuals with disabilities
self-efficacy for continuous community living
Issue Date2022
Citation
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, n. 19, article no. 12976 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study explored the impacts of five types of community support services (i.e., center-based care, home-based care, respite care, caregiver assistance, and financial subsidies) on self-efficacy for continuous community living among individuals with disabilities and caregivers. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: The sample consisted of a group of individuals with disabilities (n = 948) and a group of caregivers (n = 522). A mixed ANOVA was applied to explore the differences in the perceived importance of improvements to community support services between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the perceived importance of improvements to types of community support services for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Results: Caregivers perceived higher levels of importance for improvements to community support services than individuals with disabilities. Both groups reported that financial subsidies were the most important area for improvement. The greater importance of improvements to financial subsidies reported by caregivers predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. The greater importance of improvements to center-based services reported by individuals with disabilities predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Conclusions: The findings suggested that financial subsidies for caregivers and center-based services for individuals with disabilities could improve self-efficacy for continuous community living.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330864
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 2.849
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.808
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Wai-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Erin Yiqing-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Wai Ming-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, Hector Wing Hong-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T12:15:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T12:15:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, n. 19, article no. 12976-
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330864-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored the impacts of five types of community support services (i.e., center-based care, home-based care, respite care, caregiver assistance, and financial subsidies) on self-efficacy for continuous community living among individuals with disabilities and caregivers. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: The sample consisted of a group of individuals with disabilities (n = 948) and a group of caregivers (n = 522). A mixed ANOVA was applied to explore the differences in the perceived importance of improvements to community support services between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the perceived importance of improvements to types of community support services for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Results: Caregivers perceived higher levels of importance for improvements to community support services than individuals with disabilities. Both groups reported that financial subsidies were the most important area for improvement. The greater importance of improvements to financial subsidies reported by caregivers predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. The greater importance of improvements to center-based services reported by individuals with disabilities predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. Conclusions: The findings suggested that financial subsidies for caregivers and center-based services for individuals with disabilities could improve self-efficacy for continuous community living.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health-
dc.subjectcaregivers-
dc.subjectcenter-based services-
dc.subjectfinancial subsidy-
dc.subjectindividuals with disabilities-
dc.subjectself-efficacy for continuous community living-
dc.titleTypes of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph191912976-
dc.identifier.pmid36232276-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85139919188-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue19-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 12976-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 12976-
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000866809400001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats