File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: COVID-19 one year on: identification of at-risk groups for psychological trauma and poor health-protective behaviour using a telephone survey

TitleCOVID-19 one year on: identification of at-risk groups for psychological trauma and poor health-protective behaviour using a telephone survey
Authors
KeywordsCoronavirus
COVID-19
Psychology
Public health
Trauma
Vaccine
Issue Date2022
Citation
BMC Psychiatry, 2022, v. 22, n. 1, article no. 252 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: This study examined the profiles and correlates of psychological trauma, compliance with preventative measures, vaccine acceptance and participation in voluntary testing during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among the adult population in Hong Kong (n = 3,011). Methods: Data were collected through a telephone survey between December 2020 and February 2021, using measures of psychological trauma, compliance with preventative measures, reading news reports on COVID-19, vaccine acceptance and willingness to participate in voluntary testing. Results: The prevalence of possible post-traumatic stress disorder was found to be 12.4%. Respondents were generally compliant with routine preventative measures, and approximately half had accepted vaccination and voluntary testing. Participants who had lower levels of education, were unemployed or had no income showed greater psychological trauma symptoms, whereas female, older and more educated participants showed greater compliance with preventative measures. Participants who spent more time watching news reports of COVID-19 had greater psychological trauma, but also greater compliance. Participants who were male, older, had lower education levels or were married showed greater acceptance of vaccination and participation in voluntary testing. Conclusions: Socio-demographic factors affected both psychological trauma and engagement in health-protective measures at one year after the onset of the pandemic. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330789
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCao, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorSiu, Judy Yuen man-
dc.contributor.authorShek, Daniel T.L.-
dc.contributor.authorShum, David H.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T12:14:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T12:14:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry, 2022, v. 22, n. 1, article no. 252-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330789-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study examined the profiles and correlates of psychological trauma, compliance with preventative measures, vaccine acceptance and participation in voluntary testing during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among the adult population in Hong Kong (n = 3,011). Methods: Data were collected through a telephone survey between December 2020 and February 2021, using measures of psychological trauma, compliance with preventative measures, reading news reports on COVID-19, vaccine acceptance and willingness to participate in voluntary testing. Results: The prevalence of possible post-traumatic stress disorder was found to be 12.4%. Respondents were generally compliant with routine preventative measures, and approximately half had accepted vaccination and voluntary testing. Participants who had lower levels of education, were unemployed or had no income showed greater psychological trauma symptoms, whereas female, older and more educated participants showed greater compliance with preventative measures. Participants who spent more time watching news reports of COVID-19 had greater psychological trauma, but also greater compliance. Participants who were male, older, had lower education levels or were married showed greater acceptance of vaccination and participation in voluntary testing. Conclusions: Socio-demographic factors affected both psychological trauma and engagement in health-protective measures at one year after the onset of the pandemic. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatry-
dc.subjectCoronavirus-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectPsychology-
dc.subjectPublic health-
dc.subjectTrauma-
dc.subjectVaccine-
dc.titleCOVID-19 one year on: identification of at-risk groups for psychological trauma and poor health-protective behaviour using a telephone survey-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-022-03904-4-
dc.identifier.pmid35397502-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85127844672-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 252-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 252-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-244X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000781363000001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats