File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Can we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pretraining brain activity?

TitleCan we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pretraining brain activity?
Authors
KeywordsfMRI
functional neuroimaging
learning
meta-analysis
neurofeedback
real-time fMRI
Issue Date2020
Citation
Human Brain Mapping, 2020, v. 41, n. 14, p. 3839-3854 How to Cite?
AbstractNeurofeedback training has been shown to influence behavior in healthy participants as well as to alleviate clinical symptoms in neurological, psychosomatic, and psychiatric patient populations. However, many real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies report large inter-individual differences in learning success. The factors that cause this vast variability between participants remain unknown and their identification could enhance treatment success. Thus, here we employed a meta-analytic approach including data from 24 different neurofeedback studies with a total of 401 participants, including 140 patients, to determine whether levels of activity in target brain regions during pretraining functional localizer or no-feedback runs (i.e., self-regulation in the absence of neurofeedback) could predict neurofeedback learning success. We observed a slightly positive correlation between pretraining activity levels during a functional localizer run and neurofeedback learning success, but we were not able to identify common brain-based success predictors across our diverse cohort of studies. Therefore, advances need to be made in finding robust models and measures of general neurofeedback learning, and in increasing the current study database to allow for investigating further factors that might influence neurofeedback learning.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330649
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.626
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaugg, Amelie-
dc.contributor.authorSladky, Ronald-
dc.contributor.authorSkouras, Stavros-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Amalia-
dc.contributor.authorCraddock, Cameron-
dc.contributor.authorKirschner, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorHerdener, Marcus-
dc.contributor.authorKoush, Yury-
dc.contributor.authorPapoutsi, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorKeynan, Jackob N.-
dc.contributor.authorHendler, Talma-
dc.contributor.authorCohen Kadosh, Kathrin-
dc.contributor.authorZich, Catharina-
dc.contributor.authorMacInnes, Jeff-
dc.contributor.authorAdcock, R. Alison-
dc.contributor.authorDickerson, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Nan Kuei-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Kymberly-
dc.contributor.authorBodurka, Jerzy-
dc.contributor.authorYao, Shuxia-
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorAuer, Tibor-
dc.contributor.authorSchweizer, Renate-
dc.contributor.authorPamplona, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorEmmert, Kirsten-
dc.contributor.authorHaller, Sven-
dc.contributor.authorVan De Ville, Dimitri-
dc.contributor.authorBlefari, Maria Laura-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Youl-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorMarins, Theo-
dc.contributor.authorFukuda, Megumi-
dc.contributor.authorSorger, Bettina-
dc.contributor.authorKamp, Tabea-
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Sook Lei-
dc.contributor.authorVeit, Ralf-
dc.contributor.authorSpetter, Maartje-
dc.contributor.authorWeiskopf, Nikolaus-
dc.contributor.authorScharnowski, Frank-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T12:12:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T12:12:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Brain Mapping, 2020, v. 41, n. 14, p. 3839-3854-
dc.identifier.issn1065-9471-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330649-
dc.description.abstractNeurofeedback training has been shown to influence behavior in healthy participants as well as to alleviate clinical symptoms in neurological, psychosomatic, and psychiatric patient populations. However, many real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies report large inter-individual differences in learning success. The factors that cause this vast variability between participants remain unknown and their identification could enhance treatment success. Thus, here we employed a meta-analytic approach including data from 24 different neurofeedback studies with a total of 401 participants, including 140 patients, to determine whether levels of activity in target brain regions during pretraining functional localizer or no-feedback runs (i.e., self-regulation in the absence of neurofeedback) could predict neurofeedback learning success. We observed a slightly positive correlation between pretraining activity levels during a functional localizer run and neurofeedback learning success, but we were not able to identify common brain-based success predictors across our diverse cohort of studies. Therefore, advances need to be made in finding robust models and measures of general neurofeedback learning, and in increasing the current study database to allow for investigating further factors that might influence neurofeedback learning.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Brain Mapping-
dc.subjectfMRI-
dc.subjectfunctional neuroimaging-
dc.subjectlearning-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.subjectneurofeedback-
dc.subjectreal-time fMRI-
dc.titleCan we predict real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success from pretraining brain activity?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hbm.25089-
dc.identifier.pmid32729652-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85088806073-
dc.identifier.volume41-
dc.identifier.issue14-
dc.identifier.spage3839-
dc.identifier.epage3854-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0193-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000553610500001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats