File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.2196/publichealth.7998
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85047764254
- WOS: WOS:000526815300012
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study
Title | Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | E-cigarettes Electronic nicotine delivery systems Flavoring agents Flavors Information dissemination Information propagation Social media Social networking Social networks |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2018, v. 4, n. 3, article no. e27 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/330568 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Jiaqi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Qingpeng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zeng, Daniel Dajun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsui, Kwok Leung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-05T12:11:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-05T12:11:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2018, v. 4, n. 3, article no. e27 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/330568 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | JMIR Public Health and Surveillance | - |
dc.subject | E-cigarettes | - |
dc.subject | Electronic nicotine delivery systems | - |
dc.subject | Flavoring agents | - |
dc.subject | Flavors | - |
dc.subject | Information dissemination | - |
dc.subject | Information propagation | - |
dc.subject | Social media | - |
dc.subject | Social networking | - |
dc.subject | Social networks | - |
dc.title | Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2196/publichealth.7998 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85047764254 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. e27 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. e27 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2369-2960 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000526815300012 | - |