File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study

TitleInfluence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study
Authors
KeywordsE-cigarettes
Electronic nicotine delivery systems
Flavoring agents
Flavors
Information dissemination
Information propagation
Social media
Social networking
Social networks
Issue Date2018
Citation
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2018, v. 4, n. 3, article no. e27 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330568
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Jiaqi-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Qingpeng-
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Daniel Dajun-
dc.contributor.authorTsui, Kwok Leung-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-05T12:11:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-05T12:11:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 2018, v. 4, n. 3, article no. e27-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/330568-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJMIR Public Health and Surveillance-
dc.subjectE-cigarettes-
dc.subjectElectronic nicotine delivery systems-
dc.subjectFlavoring agents-
dc.subjectFlavors-
dc.subjectInformation dissemination-
dc.subjectInformation propagation-
dc.subjectSocial media-
dc.subjectSocial networking-
dc.subjectSocial networks-
dc.titleInfluence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/publichealth.7998-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85047764254-
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e27-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e27-
dc.identifier.eissn2369-2960-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000526815300012-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats